So I just read the post on the QED accuracy and am worried about my new EYE XO.
My experience so far.
Eye XO
I7 10700
Geforce 3070
Windows 10
Software was installed by the supplier Par2Pro
Room is 21 feet long and 15 feet 2 inches wide.
10 feet from hitting location to screen
Eye XO sensor mounted 3.5 feet in front of hitting location, approximately 10 feet to base of mount.
1 1000 lumen LED light mounted directly over the hitting location.
Projector mounted 16 feet from screen
The hitting mat is 10 feet X 5 feet centered 10 feet from the screen which is 14 feet wide.
We set up the system and followed the calibration instructions exactly. My wife and I (Both very avid golfers) hit over 500 balls and found the distances seem to read as quite short. I am quite certain of approximate distances especially with my 7 iron and pitching wedge. I have played about 130 rounds of golf this year so I have a pretty good feel for distances.
I normally hit my PW 130-140 yards. The sim (Driving range)shows me more around 100-110
I normally hit my 7i 160-175. The sim shows about 1 in 30 shots reaching 160 yards.
My wife is hitting two clubs extra to achieve her objective distances.
Thinking something must be wrong I used the program to re calibrate the sensor with no change found.
After this experience with the sim, we went to our course and played a round on closing day. On the actual course, despite what the sim had said, I was hitting my clubs the expected distances. The wind was calm and the temperature was about 50 degrees Fahrenheit.
I saw the idea of indoor golf syndrome, but offer this. This June I went to the local golf studio/instructor to try to get a feel for my carry verses total distances. I was hitting inside off of a mat. The distances I got were pretty much the same as my own experience of total distances with the carry distances being somewhere around 10 yards shorter than the totals so I'm not willing to buy into the indoor verses outdoor idea.
Surely there is something wrong. With the readings as they are, this will be a very expensive video game and not much use for real golf improvement or feedback.
I am going to try to set altitude as per the supplied program but am skeptical as I am at 99 feet so it's unlikely the system is set for a lower altitude.
Does anyone have any feedback about their EYE XO accuracy?
My experience so far.
Eye XO
I7 10700
Geforce 3070
Windows 10
Software was installed by the supplier Par2Pro
Room is 21 feet long and 15 feet 2 inches wide.
10 feet from hitting location to screen
Eye XO sensor mounted 3.5 feet in front of hitting location, approximately 10 feet to base of mount.
1 1000 lumen LED light mounted directly over the hitting location.
Projector mounted 16 feet from screen
The hitting mat is 10 feet X 5 feet centered 10 feet from the screen which is 14 feet wide.
We set up the system and followed the calibration instructions exactly. My wife and I (Both very avid golfers) hit over 500 balls and found the distances seem to read as quite short. I am quite certain of approximate distances especially with my 7 iron and pitching wedge. I have played about 130 rounds of golf this year so I have a pretty good feel for distances.
I normally hit my PW 130-140 yards. The sim (Driving range)shows me more around 100-110
I normally hit my 7i 160-175. The sim shows about 1 in 30 shots reaching 160 yards.
My wife is hitting two clubs extra to achieve her objective distances.
Thinking something must be wrong I used the program to re calibrate the sensor with no change found.
After this experience with the sim, we went to our course and played a round on closing day. On the actual course, despite what the sim had said, I was hitting my clubs the expected distances. The wind was calm and the temperature was about 50 degrees Fahrenheit.
I saw the idea of indoor golf syndrome, but offer this. This June I went to the local golf studio/instructor to try to get a feel for my carry verses total distances. I was hitting inside off of a mat. The distances I got were pretty much the same as my own experience of total distances with the carry distances being somewhere around 10 yards shorter than the totals so I'm not willing to buy into the indoor verses outdoor idea.
Surely there is something wrong. With the readings as they are, this will be a very expensive video game and not much use for real golf improvement or feedback.
I am going to try to set altitude as per the supplied program but am skeptical as I am at 99 feet so it's unlikely the system is set for a lower altitude.
Does anyone have any feedback about their EYE XO accuracy?
Comment