I am a long-time X2 user. I have a backyard set up, hitting into a net.
Spin rate is the only data parameter that is problematic. I am conscious of placing the dots on the target line axis. I would estimate that 33% of shots have a spin rate misread (i.e., the data is low and italicised). With new dots this number is lower. My theory is that the (coarse) net damages the dots, which compromises their ability to do whatever they do.
Does my theory have any merit?
Should I create a "softer surface" where the ball hits the net? If so what might material would work?
What is the current "best practice" to ensure valid/reliable spin rates? Any home made remedies? Anyone using snowman configurations (two dots side by side)?
Spin rate is the only data parameter that is problematic. I am conscious of placing the dots on the target line axis. I would estimate that 33% of shots have a spin rate misread (i.e., the data is low and italicised). With new dots this number is lower. My theory is that the (coarse) net damages the dots, which compromises their ability to do whatever they do.
Does my theory have any merit?
Should I create a "softer surface" where the ball hits the net? If so what might material would work?
What is the current "best practice" to ensure valid/reliable spin rates? Any home made remedies? Anyone using snowman configurations (two dots side by side)?
Comment