Do you think people would rather have 4 dot trees for easy application of 4 dots to each club....or singles. I like the trees but they waste some reflective material. I'd be interested in opinions. More dots or trees??
-
-
IMHO 4 dots would be a pain trying not to get them dirty or messed up peeling 4 off at one time then trying to apply them to a club, I don't see how it would save any time over single dots because of that. More dots at less cost to me would be the way to go, whole point to me would be the easy of use, cost, and how well they work. -
Singles for sureMy Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt RangeComment
-
Single dots definitely.Comment
-
Single dots with the small tabs seem the best of both worlds !! And most bang for the buck (both ways).Comment
Comment