GC2 with E6

[richerod]

Has anyone tried GC2 with E6? Wondering if it performs similar to Quad using E6. From what I’ve seen from Jay’s videos the Quad impact to screen response is impressive. Would GC2 be as fluid? How does GC2 connect with E6? When I’ve seen GC2 with TGC 2019 there is a minimal delay. Is that because of the Bluetooth?

[vrpunk]

Get the demo and try it, if you have fsx you can get a 2 week demo of e6 connect from foresight online
No delay on GC2, instant.

[bm11]

Get the demo and try it, if you have fsx you can get a 2 week demo of e6 connect from foresight online

Not last I talked to them, which wasn't long ago. Is this a new development?

[vrpunk]

Goto the online shop and e6 section, you will see a button Request Demo, took about 1 day for them to send me links and demo activation codes

[bm11]

Goto the online shop and e6 section, you will see a button Request Demo, took about 1 day for them to send me links and demo activation codes

That is excellent news!

[flightscoperick]

Don’t forget to join us on Discord to play E6 https://discord.gg/GwBE2cd

[juicejr]

Performs really well - graphically much better than FSX but I'm wondering if the ball data is as accurate. I noticed that my 5W could travel 240 yds but in reality and on FSX a solid 5W strike would go 215-220 max. A lot of comments on ball physics too - FSX feels more accurate in this regard too.

[richerod]

How did the carry numbers compare?

[ulmaniac]

the ball data will be the same in all ( launch monitor sends same numbers ).....but the algorithms for the different software..TGC..FSX..E6...will all calculate different ball flight

[Flipper888]

E6 does not calculate ball flight accurately with GCQuad, peak height is too low by 30% which is huge with driver. Hence, carry distances are all wrong. Stick with FSX 2020, it is more reliable than E6 connect. Foresight rep told me they are working on E6 to incorporate their ball flight algorithm.