Today I took my GC2 and HMT to my pro and compared to trackman 3. Just FYI it's in many instances 1-2% difference and at max about 10%.
-
-
I've also done that and posted my pics before. In the industry it's well known that only the HMT accurately measures the face. Radar devices cannot see the face so they calculate the face angle. I've spoken to manufacturers reps from Ping and TM. Both said the GC2 measure spin more accurately. Both are amazing IMO.My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range -
Interesting you say that about spin as the spin rates were the one area the trackman was always higher on. I actually emailed foresight with some data points to ask about this but am yet to hear back.Comment
Comment