How accurate is the club head speed data for GC2 when listed in TGC? Anyone with HMT getting similar numbers as that calculated by TGC?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Club Head Speed-GC2
Collapse
X
-
It's not terrible. I use the HMT all the time. It assumes a certain smash factor.My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range
-
What are you wanting club head speed for? tgc assumes a certain smash factor which may or may not match your hit so it doesn't really tell you anything. I can't think of anything useful one could do with the tgc value.
Also, you probably already know but just in case you don't, one doesn't need a $6500 HMT to measure CHS. Any decent swing radar will do that for about $50. I have a Yupiteru ball and club radar that works great for measuring both.
Comment
-
IMO the HMT is amazing. It sees the face. Trackman doesn't.Originally posted by ShootingLow View PostAgreed FautlyClubs, but HMT is not just for CHS. Mthunt, what do you think of the additional readings - path, loft, lie, AOA, impact, etc?My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range
- Likes 1
Comment
-
My coach has the GC2 with HMT and an XiTour running at the same time in his room but he got everything for free. It's overkill. The Xi is not as accurate indoors.Originally posted by mystic View Postwhat if you had the GC2/HMT with an XiTour? I wonder how that would work....My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range
Comment
-
Club head speed calculation on gc2 assumes 1.45 smash factor. That is pretty much sweet spot for a driver and typically drops a bit through the bag. I believe from reading a link the average pga player is 1.48 on a driver. So, your swing speed could very well be reported as lower on not well struck balls.
Comment
-
The GC2 doesn't calculate or display CHS.
The average PGA smash factor for driver is 1.49. For LPGA it's 1.47. For both it drops down to 1.23 depending on club.
For amaters the smash factor could be anything. Even on the same club. We usually have a lot of variation in our hits.
A $100 ball/club swing speed analyzer can measure everything and is a good investment for anyone working on swing speed.
Just looking at ball speed is tricky when working on CHS. You can easily make a swing change that results in improved CHS but because of a lower smash factor the ball speed goes down so you reject that change as an improvement.
Often improving our smash factor makes more difference in distance than anything else we can do.
Comment
-
Hard to follow thread, some differing takes above . To summarize Smash factor on TGC can be a decent guess or atrocious and fake? Asking cause I banged 50 Sw shots on rewind yesterday and concluded SF seemed useless.
But stupidly, now that I read this, I started to zone in club head speed yesterday eating it up. It seemed to be true I'd say, at least relative differentials.
But if SF is fairly bogus, then chs which it's based on is a TGC /GC2 guess too right? Is that what the thread just said above??
Comment
Comment