I was prepared to order all my simulator build items today, but over the weekend I had a friend over and showed him what I was thinking and he threw a curveball that is having me second guess the whole build!
. I've attached the images of the space I'm using.
My plan was originally to have the simulator run longways with a 10' wide screen, 9'8" tall fitted between the big beams. I would use the projector in 4:3 and have to deal with some letterbox black lines on top and bottom. I would have curtains/netting running alongside hanging just inside the two cross beams velcroed to the screen sides and an archery net overtop for high angle shots/misses.
My friend suggested "flipping" the layout and have the screen in front of where the tv now is (I may remove the tv to be safe, we never use). I would get a wider screen 13'4" x 8'8" which I could use 16:9 layout for. In this layout I would tuck the screen in the 4' space between the back wall with the tv and the big cross beam. The question is how to deal with the length of the room being 18' and also the cross beam being in front of the hitting screen.
I was thinking I would have the screen 12-18" from the back wall and hang an archery net behind it to further project the tv wall. That would leave me 16.5ft to the back wall. And it would leave 2.5' - 3' to the cross beam. Because the big cross beam is 8'8" tall, that's the start of the top of the screen. I'd have to figure out how to "protect" the cross beam from ball strikes from high lofted clubs and mishits as the screen would be hanging behind it and I'd be hitting towards it.
One idea given that my screen height on the project will be less than the 8'8" beam, I attach a net to screen and wrap it down and under the beam to the ceiling on the hitting side at 9'8 and run that back over my hitting position. I'd also have some kind of foam pad to attach to the beam since the net will pulled against the direct bottom of it. Would this work? I am thinking about this wrong? See attached drawing for ref.
Then the second part of going wide... is 16'5" enough depth for the Garmin r10? Part of me thinks just going with the original, 4:3 setup is "easier" and safer as far as execution risk goes, but it would be sweet having a wide screen.
Appreciate the time and look!
. I've attached the images of the space I'm using.My plan was originally to have the simulator run longways with a 10' wide screen, 9'8" tall fitted between the big beams. I would use the projector in 4:3 and have to deal with some letterbox black lines on top and bottom. I would have curtains/netting running alongside hanging just inside the two cross beams velcroed to the screen sides and an archery net overtop for high angle shots/misses.
My friend suggested "flipping" the layout and have the screen in front of where the tv now is (I may remove the tv to be safe, we never use). I would get a wider screen 13'4" x 8'8" which I could use 16:9 layout for. In this layout I would tuck the screen in the 4' space between the back wall with the tv and the big cross beam. The question is how to deal with the length of the room being 18' and also the cross beam being in front of the hitting screen.
I was thinking I would have the screen 12-18" from the back wall and hang an archery net behind it to further project the tv wall. That would leave me 16.5ft to the back wall. And it would leave 2.5' - 3' to the cross beam. Because the big cross beam is 8'8" tall, that's the start of the top of the screen. I'd have to figure out how to "protect" the cross beam from ball strikes from high lofted clubs and mishits as the screen would be hanging behind it and I'd be hitting towards it.
One idea given that my screen height on the project will be less than the 8'8" beam, I attach a net to screen and wrap it down and under the beam to the ceiling on the hitting side at 9'8 and run that back over my hitting position. I'd also have some kind of foam pad to attach to the beam since the net will pulled against the direct bottom of it. Would this work? I am thinking about this wrong? See attached drawing for ref.
Then the second part of going wide... is 16'5" enough depth for the Garmin r10? Part of me thinks just going with the original, 4:3 setup is "easier" and safer as far as execution risk goes, but it would be sweet having a wide screen.
Appreciate the time and look!
well done. Looks amazing and love the detailed posts.
Comment