What about 3D printed tees?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JackedUpSwing
    replied
    Please make sure these stand up on fiberbuilt mats. The tomahawk tees were way more durable than the birtees, but they can’t stand up on the fiberbuilt mat(they just sink down in it).

    Leave a comment:


  • leibin
    replied
    I have a new design that lasted pretty well, but I ordered some Ninjaflex TPU with a hardness of 85A vs at least 95A on what I've been using. Should be here in a couple of days. I think I'll be able to do something closer to the birtee design and have longevity with it. I'll update the thread as that progresses.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mahoooner
    replied
    If anyone gets an update on that Fibrebuilt ramp, please let me know!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jnc10
    replied
    I printed version 6 of this tee and it seems to hold up the best out of all I have printed

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome
    replied
    This went 15 shots with no signs of damage in 35F weather before I lost it.
    TPU, 250 nozzle, 0.1mm layers. 20mm/sec speed.
    No supports and printed upright.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ob7...ew?usp=sharing
    Click image for larger version  Name:	best.png Views:	0 Size:	37.3 KB ID:	307779
    Last edited by Jerome; 12-30-2020, 07:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jerome
    commented on 's reply
    Sideways printed tee still split between layers. Increasing temp to 250 and changing layer to 0.1mm.

  • Jnc10
    commented on 's reply
    yep. i snapped a #48 right at the base in 3 swings

  • Jerome
    commented on 's reply
    For 100mph club head speed, If the club hits the tee 1 inch behind the ball it will strike the ball 0.006 seconds later. My thinking was that the ball would not move much in 6 thousands of a second. This design is moot for me anyway.

    Being able to print(got my printer yesterday) and test designs helps a lot. Tomahawk like design (post #46) in TPU 0.2mm layers was good for 20+ swings. The cone shape is a big issue. The cone adds rigidity that we don't want. A sideways printed version of post #42 is much stronger and more flexible but it needs supports to print which is a pain. I just printed ,vertically, a non-cone version of post #42 with feet but no holes(i will punch the holes because they don't print well). Will test this soon.

    I like post #48 but that base at the bottom has too much mass and thus inertia. It is going to want to stay in place while the top wants to shoot off at 100mph.
    Last edited by Jerome; 12-30-2020, 02:41 PM.

  • leibin
    commented on 's reply
    I think I somehow just flagged this post when trying to comment - my bad . Unless you pick the ball clean on that tee I think it will get in the way. The idea with the tee is tee have the least amount of interaction possible with both the club and the ball. I do like the thought process though!

  • Diceberg
    commented on 's reply
    I like the concept of absorbing the energy. Will this cause the ball to "move" in any unacceptable way just before impact?

  • Jerome
    commented on 's reply
    TPU version was still serviceable after 20 driver shots. I'll print 9 more overnight.

  • Jerome
    commented on 's reply
    Printed this in PLA just to test my printer. Broke second swing. Setting up TPU print now.

  • Jnc10
    commented on 's reply
    I made this with 20% infill with some goo quality TPU and it broke in 3 swings at the base where it meets the skinnier part
    how much infill do you normally use?

  • Jerome
    replied
    I had this idea last night. The thought is to vector the energy down and the tee wont fly away.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jnc10
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	D8647608-907E-48A4-9F55-E8AD1E577DE6.jpeg
Views:	2108
Size:	191.7 KB
ID:	307296 This is what I printed today
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...