New ProTee Labs Updates!!

[ProTee Alonso]

Hello everyone!

We’ve just updated ProTee Labs for both Stable and Beta. We can’t wait for you to check out the new improvements for yourselves.

We won’t spoil anything here—go ahead and explore what’s new!

Happy testing! 🚀

ProTee Labs Changelog – ProTee Customer Support Center
ProTee Labs BETA Changelog – ProTee Customer Support Center

[Bubba22]

Awesome!! Will be testing!!

[Patator100]

ProTee Alonso

Thanks for the updates from ProTee United B.V., it shows the investment in r&d on top of customer service.
I can see that Protee is working on improvement of the AI model for club data and AoA readings. In which way will you improve it ? Accuracy or consistency ? Which system are you using to check the accuracy of your readings ? (phantom cameras, other LM?).
Is Protee able to produce a tolerance table for all measurements produce by the VX ? (As TM or flightscope does)

Tm4
Ball Speed: 0.1 mph
• Club Speed: 0.1 mph
• Attack Angle (AoA): 0.3°
• Launch Angle: 0.2°
• Club Path: 0.4°
• Face Angle: 0.4°
• Spin Rate: +/- 100 rpm

Gcquad
Ball Speed: 0.1 mph
• Club Speed: 0.1 mph
• Attack Angle (AoA): 0.2°
• Launch Angle: 0.2°
• Club Path: 0.1°
• Face Angle: 0.1°
• Spin Rate: +/- 50 rpm

X3

Ball Speed: 0.1 mph
• Club Speed: 0.1 mph
• Attack Angle (AoA): 0.5°
• Launch Angle: 0.1°
• Club Path: 0.5°
• Face Angle: 0.5°
• Spin Rate: +/- 100 rpm

thanks

[Patator100]

Bubba22 - have you tested AoA ?
i m really hesitating in between protee vx and Trackman io to substitute my tm4. Club metrics are important to me.
and what about dimple reading ?

thanks

[Bubba22]

Dimple reading is very good. I will test it this week against my GC3. I have not tested AOA but can do do against my GC3 and Mevo Gen 2.

[Patator100]

Thanks bubba. If you dont mind, can your also check face to path ? Maybe if you can take pictures of both devices data table, we will give that to ChatGPT or Gemini and they will give us the results ! (Variance…)

[Bubba22]

Thanks bubba. If you dont mind, can your also check face to path ? Maybe if you can take pictures of both devices data table, we will give that to ChatGPT or Gemini and they will give us the results ! (Variance…)

Here you go Patator100. I did AOA today Protee VS Mevo Plus. This was comparing 20 shots with Driver, 22° hybrid, 7 iron and wedge but just comparing AOA. Ball was a Prov 1 RCT balls. I can compare face to path tomorrow and post it.

ProteeMevoAOA.xlsx

[Patator100]

Great bubba. How accurate is mevo+ ? Would’ t it be better to do it with your gc3 ? If so, having also spin, ball speed and club speed will be the ideal.

i ve loaded the data in Gemini and here is the answer



Key Observations

1. The Variance Gap

The most striking finding in this data is that the ProTee VX generally shows higher variance (Standard Deviation) than the Mevo+ on iron and hybrid shots.

• For the 7 Iron and P-Wedge, the Mevo+ has a standard deviation under 0.9, while the ProTee is significantly higher (1.3 to 1.4).

• This suggests that the Mevo+ (with RCT balls) provides a more "consistent" read shot-to-shot indoors for descending strikes.

2. Driver Performance (Positive AoA)

Interestingly, the Driver is where the two units agree most closely. Both show a positive (upward) angle of attack, with means within 0.6° of each other.

• The ProTee actually showed slightly lower variance (1.15 vs 1.29) here.

• One specific shot in the Mevo+ data (0.4°) looks like an outlier compared to the rest of the set; without that shot, the Mevo+ would be even closer to the ProTee average.

3. Systematic Differences in Hybrids

There is a notable 0.8° difference in the mean for the Hybrid. The ProTee recorded much steeper strikes (averaging -3.5°) compared to the Mevo+ (-2.7°).

• The ProTee's Hybrid range was quite wide (6.1° spread), whereas the Mevo+ stayed much tighter (2.4° spread). This might indicate the ProTee's AI vision is more sensitive to small changes in club delivery with larger clubheads.

Conclusion

"The data shows that while both units track the general trend of the swing (upward for driver, downward for irons), the Mevo+ with RCT balls displays higher precision (lower standard deviation) for iron play. The ProTee VX is impressively close on Driver AoA but exhibits more 'noise' or variance on descending blows compared to the radar-based Fusion Tracking of the Mevo+."




DRIVER

ProTee: Mean +3.44° | Std Dev 1.15 | Range 2.0 to 5.5

Mevo+: Mean +2.80° | Std Dev 1.29 | Range 0.4 to 4.3

HYBRID

ProTee: Mean -3.51° | Std Dev 1.76 | Range -6.5 to -0.4

Mevo+: Mean -2.72° | Std Dev 0.72 | Range -3.8 to -1.4

7 IRON

ProTee: Mean -2.33° | Std Dev 1.34 | Range -4.8 to -0.4

Mevo+: Mean -2.95° | Std Dev 0.85 | Range -4.7 to -1.8

P-WEDGE

ProTee: Mean -4.35° | Std Dev 1.38 | Range -6.5 to -2.0

Mevo+: Mean -4.63° | Std Dev 0.86 | Range -6.1 to -2.9




THANks

[Patator100]

I m now adding the comparison result head to head and not the variance of club for each shot - it might be the result of inconsistency in the swing





SHOT-BY-SHOT COMPARISON DATA

DRIVER

• Average Difference: 1.16°

• Max Difference: 2.80°

• Correlation (R²): 0.42 (Low)

HYBRID

• Average Difference: 1.34°

• Max Difference: 3.30°

• Correlation (R²): 0.32 (Low)

7 IRON

• Average Difference: 0.94°

• Max Difference: 2.50°

• Correlation (R²): 0.71 (Strong)

P-WEDGE

• Average Difference: 0.74°

• Max Difference: 1.50°

• Correlation (R²): 0.65 (Moderate)

FINAL ANALYSIS

Analysis of ProTee VX vs. Mevo+ (RCT Balls) - Angle of Attack

When looking at the direct shot-by-shot data, we see a clear distinction between iron play and woods/hybrids:

1. Iron Precision:

The agreement between the two units on the 7-iron and Pitching Wedge is impressive. An average gap of less than 1° and a strong correlation (0.71 for the 7-iron) indicates that both the ProTee cameras and the Mevo+ radar are seeing the same club delivery patterns. If one unit reads a steeper strike, the other follows suit consistently.

2. Driver & Hybrid Discrepancy:

The Driver shows a lower correlation (0.42). While both units agree the strike is "upward" (positive AoA), they often disagree on the magnitude of that angle. For example, on the same shot, one might read +5° while the other reads +2°. This suggests that club speed and head size may affect how the camera-based AI and radar Fusion Tracking interpret the exact moment of impact.

3. Standard Deviation & Noise:

The Mevo+ shows a much tighter "Standard Deviation" on irons and hybrids. The ProTee VX data exhibits more variance (or "noise"), particularly on the Hybrid, where the swing-to-swing readings swung more wildly than the Mevo+ reported.

Conclusion:

For serious iron practice where AoA precision is key, both units are highly reliable and track closely together. For high-speed Driver shots, they provide a good general trend but can differ on a shot-by-shot basis by over 2 degrees.

[Patator100]

Also bubba to avoid you type all data in xls, just take screenshots of your data tables. I will put them in Gemini, it will recapture everything. Much quicker for you and we can have all ball and club data ;-)

[Patator100]

Hi bubba. I found a vx close to my place thanks to a reseller. I will run a match protee vx vs tm4 with rct ball on the 21th feb. I will post the results on here

[bombri]

Is there any intention to improve the ball flight algorithm within Protee labs? When I use my ProTee unit within GSPro the carry distances are often meaningfully different. I have protee and gspro set to no elevation and no wind (in GSpro). Additionally, my GSPro unit is much closer to the ball flight algorithm within Uneekor (my previous LM) and also foresight GC3 which I have used to compare metrics side by side. This seems like a big area of lack inside ProTee labs, especially if one intends to use the software for bag mapping.

[mthunt]

Is there any intention to improve the ball flight algorithm within Protee labs? When I use my ProTee unit within GSPro the carry distances are often meaningfully different. I have protee and gspro set to no elevation and no wind (in GSpro). Additionally, my GSPro unit is much closer to the ball flight algorithm within Uneekor (my previous LM) and also foresight GC3 which I have used to compare metrics side by side. This seems like a big area of lack inside ProTee labs, especially if one intends to use the software for bag mapping.

You can match the carry number thus calibrate your VX to GSPro. Just add elevation in physics until they match. It only changes the carry number in Labs. GSPro creates its own carry.

[Patator100]

I did compare my tm4 to Protee vx over the week end. Great lm but carry was off by 10pct. We increase elevation to 3000m and everything was fine.
I let you appreciate the data on my spreadsheet.