SkyTrak at the Range - Bag Mapping Frustration

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MysteryV
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2018
    • 26

    #1

    SkyTrak at the Range - Bag Mapping Frustration

    So finally took my SkyTrak to the range for the first time last night.

    Goals:
    - Determine alignment - laser vs case w/ alignment rods
    - Verify data - get a feel for shots in the garage vs shots on the range
    - Map my bag

    Results:

    - Alignment - I found that the case w/ alignment rod was pretty close while "alignment mode" was ~20 degrees off to the left (meaning that the dots would indicate my SkyTrak unit should be rotated ~20 degrees clockwise or open to the path)

    - Verify Data - seemed pretty close, however spin seemed under reported - particularly on the driver. I hit a couple of mega-slices that registered much less offline in the app than they were on the range. Spin in general was low, however whether that was due to the awful range balls, lighting, or hardware could not be determined (which leads to my next issue)

    - Missed Shots - When I started the session, the sun was up, and there were certainly several missed shots, however the percentage of shots missed increased DRAMATICALLY once the sun went down. Once the sun was down and I was under the fluorescent lighting w/ some additional range lighting, I was STRUGGLING to get ANY shots to register. I literally hit 20 - 30 5i shots and was only able to get 7 to register. It seemed as though pushed / faded shots had a better chance of being read, however it was pretty spotty.

    - Bag Mapping - The bag mapping feature was something I was looking forward to, however the lack of adjustability during the session was beyond frustrating. I'd set up a 13 club mapping at 8 shots per club, however once the sun went down and shots stopped registering, I realized that there was no option to change the settings. Essentially, I was stuck having to finish the mapping (which was impossible) or cut it short which APPEARS (though this could be user error) to discard all of the data.


    If this is completely user error, I certainly welcome comments and fixes. If these are just well known issues, it seems that we have some significant opportunities for improvement.
  • cmckelvmi
    Advanced Member
    • Dec 2017
    • 474

    #2
    The alignment issue is weird, I will need to check that out tonight after work. I found the bag mapping a little too restrictive with options as well. Still looking forward to being able to try the ST at the range once the weather cooperates. Speaking of 'no-reads', I bought a box of Truvis balls and ended up with more 'no-reads' than I have ever had with any other white or yellow balls.

    Comment

    • MysteryV
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2018
      • 26

      #3
      Originally posted by cmckelvmi View Post
      The alignment issue is weird, I will need to check that out tonight after work. I found the bag mapping a little too restrictive with options as well. Still looking forward to being able to try the ST at the range once the weather cooperates. Speaking of 'no-reads', I bought a box of Truvis balls and ended up with more 'no-reads' than I have ever had with any other white or yellow balls.
      Yup - I actually ran into that indoors as well. I assume the pictures are too similar for it to be able to pick out points of reference, but definitely not what I expected going in.

      Comment

      • SkyTrak_Seth
        Manufacturer
        • Nov 2014
        • 1603

        #4
        The side angle discrepancy of 20 degrees off should never occur...have you had a chance to test indoors as well? If so, same result? If that is the case, then the unit definitely needs to be sent back in/replaced.

        The unit should perform better in low light (even no light). Were you hitting off a mat or off grass?

        Comment

        • MysteryV
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2018
          • 26

          #5
          Hi SkyTrak_Seth ,

          Thanks for the reply! I posted the attached picture in the alignment thread, and also read your last post talking about how they're intended for ball placement rather than alignment. I'm a huge fan of SkyTrak as a product and company, however not providing an accurate, repeatable alignment process is a significant "miss". I actually hit about 1k shots in my garage using the alignment dots before discovering that they were so far off, and have developed a pretty bad push, that wasn't there before.

          While obviously developing technology seems easy to all of us arm-chair project manager / tech experts (especially those of us who are tech sales guys) - an alignment method similar to that of the GC Quad which uses a reflective rod to calibrate, would be AMAZING!!! So you, just like - code one in or whatever.

          Comment

          Working...