Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mevo+ .09 vs Trackman 4 Indoors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mevo+ .09 vs Trackman 4 Indoors

    I collected some data this morning and I think it was a fair enough data capture to post on it now (albeit setup still not perfect).

    Setup:
    - Indoor hitting studio with 8' TM4 and M+ to ball and 20' of ball flight. I put M+ in Short Indoor mode as it's what I can use at home.
    - TM4 and M+ were setup beside each other because I couldn't move TM4. The Mevo+ was off center which is the second time I've done this test and the first time I had the M+ on golf side of TM4 and this time it was on opposite side (this matters in observations).
    - TP5 balls with metal dot.
    - FS Golf App vs TM Studio (so flight algorithms vary)
    - After the first shot neither device had a no read (for whatever reason my M+ first ball every session is 0 mph ball speed and blank every other field then it works fine).

    Commentary:
    - I hit the ball awful with lot's of misses (mostly left but some right). This was probably good for testing so I left in all the shots regardless how bad they were. But it's never a good sign when later in my lesson I was hitting 3 hybrid with 150 mph ball speed and in my warmup when I captured this data I struggled to get driver above 150.
    - The HLA is consistently about 2* left on M+ vs TM4. I had the same issue last time I tested but it was the other way. This has me convinced HLA is accurate but offsetting the device as much as I have to in this test has an influence even using the centering feature in the app (I'm simply moving the aim line too far I think). I also see very close to zero HLA at home hitting a centered string in my net. I'm not sure how much if any influence this could have on the spin axis.
    - On a tech support call with FS a couple weeks ago when explaining my issues I had mentioned testing next to TM4 and they suggested the two radars could interfere with each other. Given most of the data looks solid they may be cautious on this statement but I should note it.
    - I will post attach the data so I will only make a few broad statements on data.
    - Carry distance M+ was a bit short in the longer clubs and a bit long in the wedge. The wedge isn't obvious to me why as the ball data seems pretty similar at quick glance.
    - Total spin readings are either extremely close or very different there is no off by a little. In the low spin driver/3 wood on TM4 vs high spin on M+ I actually think the M+ was correct. I was hitting those clubs terribly but I simply don't hit many shots at 2k or less spin in general.
    - HLA is discussed above but I will reiterate that I think M+ is bang on despite my data suggesting it's left biased.
    - AoA needs more testing as my last test I got pretty close and this test the M+ was almost always way steeper. I was focused on ball data today.

    Spin Axis:
    - This gets it's own section.
    - For SW it was almost an exact match on both devices on all shots and I would say 7 iron was pretty darn close also.
    - For 4h, 3w and driver gear effect must be driving a lot of difference. I had the TM4 impact location up as I was hitting balls and I was not hitting the center often (as the ball data will show you). Many of the shots where the devices produced different shot shapes it seemed like TM had picked up gear effect and M+ did not. I know FS has said they are measuring spin axis and maybe they are but my testing suggests its being based heavily on club data. Any time the flight shape differed it looked like TM4 shape made sense considering gear and M+ looked to ignore it (i.e., heel strikes hooking on M+ but not on TM4 and toe balls coming back on TM4 but hanging on M+).
    - I was able to easily hit push draws and pull cuts now on M+ when I couldn't hit push draws easily before. So I do think things are getting better and I need to hit the center of the face to see if that gives good results but the massive flares right don't seem to be an issue that I had before.

    I have to run out and this took longer to type up than I had thought so I'll try to post the spreadsheet of data a bit later.

  • #2
    Great info so far. My first take (please correct me if it’s wrong) - Given the 10x price difference, if we have to live with inaccurate spin axis indoors on misshits, the Mevo+ appears to be a bargain.

    Comment


    • Gresh12
      Gresh12 commented
      Editing a comment
      If you bring in cost differential at all the Mevo+ is shockingly accurate in my opinion.

      Except for extreme heel or toe strikes (I hit a couple awful ones) when you visually looked at the top view in Mevo+ vs TM4 software the shot dispersion graphic looked super similar.

      TM is awesome and if money was no object I'd buy one. I love using it once a week and I've barely scratched the surface of it's software.

      However, I'm not in a position to spend $20k on a launch monitor so I do agree that for $2k Mevo+ is great value.

  • #3
    Great stuff Gresh12 . Your comparison really confirms what I see as well indoors... wedge distances seem slightly long, woods/hybrids very slightly short.. mid irons bang on.... and the .09 firmware has significantly improved the wild right spin axis issues, but off center hits are still problematic for the Mevo+ in short indoor... more prominently in woods/hybrids/driver. Toe shots on irons stay pretty straight for me now, but dont usually draw back... toe shots on woods/driver though that start right, keep cutting right with right spin axis when I know those almost always draw back outdoors..

    Hopefully, FS can continue to tweak algorithms to improve it.. but it really seems the only explanation is use of club data to aid the spin readings. If it truly directly measures spin axis those geared toe shot driver shots would have left spin axis not right given the amount of bulge and roll on the face compared to irons..

    I'm glad .09 firmware improved things. I can live with the slight axis issues on off center hits since I can feel those and discard those shots when practicing... I'd still like to see it further improved though... so time will tell.

    Looking forward to your data.. thanks for doing this!

    Comment


    • #4
      Originally posted by Gresh12 View Post
      - The HLA is consistently about 2* left on M+ vs TM4.
      I've noticed this with my Mevo+. I set aligment line to the left of my center line and things work well but it's not a science. I wish Flightscope would simple make that adjustment to the alignment line.

      Comment


      • Gresh12
        Gresh12 commented
        Editing a comment
        I've found my M+ spot on when I do most of the alignment by physically moving the device then using the software to do "a click or two" to fine tune.

    • #5
      Uploading Excel sheet.
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • 7iron
        7iron commented
        Editing a comment
        Great data, Thanks for uploading that. Checking my M+ against a ST with the Ass Pro at the Golf course today.

        Did you export you data to Excel or type it up manually?

      • Gresh12
        Gresh12 commented
        Editing a comment
        I typed it in. Neither machine missed a shot after the first ball so there was no issues syncing them up and I have a job that involves lots of data so keying in numbers goes fast.

        I can't think of an accessible GC2 around me and I've never seen a Quad in person which would be a nice test. I don't trust the Golf Town near me as my buddy hits it hard but their machine had him driving it 340 yards at sea level when he tested drivers and they aren't going to give me half an hour to do a side by side on my launch monitor anyway.

    • #6
      Gresh12 Great test. Thanks for doing that. One thing I notice that is common with what I have seen with using my ST along side the Mevo+ (and yes I know the ST is not a TM) but where you see shorter carry with longer clubs like driver and 3W and then see longer carry with short clubs and irons, I see the same thing when testing against the ST. Will be interesting when the M+ is tested against other LM to see if that trend continues. Mevo+ did okay and I’m sure FS can continue to improve it.

      Comment


      • #7
        Trackman sometimes messes up the club speed if you misshit it. Hit from toe = lower club speed. Heel hits don't mess it up that much

        Comment


        • #8
          Gresh12 Thank you, this kind of comparison data in table form is much better than just verbal testing comments!
          Last edited by kahi; 06-06-2020, 06:44 PM.

          Comment


          • #9
            Originally posted by Aapo View Post
            Trackman sometimes messes up the club speed if you misshit it. Hit from toe = lower club speed. Heel hits don't mess it up that much
            Not sure this makes sense to me? TM measures club head speed by measuring the Center of gravity of the club at the point of impact? This not sure how hitting the toe makes a difference? Also the toe of the club moves faster than the heel , this not sure what you mean when you say toe = lower club speed

            Comment

            Working...
            X