GC3 or GCQUAD for a inspiring tour pro level golfer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Clubproguygroupie
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2023
    • 3

    #1

    GC3 or GCQUAD for a inspiring tour pro level golfer

    Hey guys,
    So I found out about the upnext program and I'm going to reach out regarding acquiring a unit.
    I currently compete for my national team, have a WAGR rank, and on titleist player support.

    I have a very solid grasp of swing mechanics ( MORAD, S&T, TGM), my only query is whether or not the GC3 with the club add-on package vs the gcquad with the club add-on would be worth the money. I'm not sure how much of a discount you get with the upnext program but it says up to 50%.

    My main goals for the unit are to see very accurate carry numbers and perform a lot of pressurized target practice, club speed, ball speed, path, angle of attack, and face would be nice but I'm assuming I can figure the face out from the spin axis and path.

    What do you guys think? with the 50% discount should I go for a quad or GC3.

    I also don't care about software as I'm not looking to play sim golf, just pure performance mode. Ideally, the Trackman Performance Center software is my goal but it doesn't make sense to go for a Trackman with the yearly fee and the price the more cumbersome setup process, and the lack of on-course use.

    I'd mainly be using my iPad Pro and iPhone so I guess that would limit me to the FSX Pro software.


    So for my goals:
    Dialing in carry distances
    Hitting targets under pressure
    Setting parameters for driver practice
    Doing skill challenges
    On course use


    Which would you recommend I go for considering the discount from the program?

    Thanks !
  • PittsburghRed
    Member
    • Oct 2019
    • 89

    #2
    dont forget the quad has the putting mode which I have found useful, its not Sam lab but its pretty good.

    Comment


    • Clubproguygroupie
      Clubproguygroupie commented
      Editing a comment
      Hi! thanks for responding.
      I don't see the benefit of it to be honest.
      I find a simple visio template and a ball gate more effective in ironing out the stroke than trying to chase numbers, especially in putting. technique isn't huge as long as acceleration rates are in order
  • ENadeau
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2023
    • 126

    #3
    GCQuad 100%. Whether you're testing new equipment or trying to get dialed in to the nth degree, having all club metrics seems like a no brainer at your level. Especially if you're getting it at 50% off...

    Comment

    • StalefishFS3
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2019
      • 186

      #4
      The ball data will be, for the most part, identical.

      It all boils down to what you think is important, and if it is worth it to you. Do a comparison as to what Quad offers extra vs. GC3 pertaining to club data. If you want it or need it (examples: impact location, lie angles, closure rate), then get the Quad.

      Comment

      • Kcct82
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2020
        • 19

        #5
        Get the “tour pro level” unit if you want to be one 😆

        Comment

        Working...