Tweet
Looking to pull the trigger on the Uneekor. The distance differences people are seeing from skytrak to Uneekor or GC2 to Uneekor dont really bother me. I am more curious to see the club data differences. Has anyone done any tests to compare club data results? Ive been trying to find them with no luck.
-
-
This is the comparison I am really waiting to see as well. If the club data is accurate, that pretty much seals the deal for me. But from the videos I have watched its also what worries me the most. If the club data isnt accurate its a toss up over a tried and trusted GC2 which is $5,500 refurbished from Foresight. Definitely still some advantages regardless though with Uneekor. -
I hope I'm not being too naive, but what gene438 has mentioned about the video feedback with each shot locks me in for wanting a Uneekor ASAP.Comment
-
It would be great if this thread, or even another thread, could continue to update data acquisition of the Uneekor vs. a GCQuad (or GC2/HMT). Taking Trackman out of the equation, I consider GCQuad to be the standard bearer for all things data for inside use. I'd love to see how the Uneekor holds up to what GCQuad measures, per Foresight's website:
BALL DATA:- Ball Speed
- Launch Angle (Vertical)
- Azimuth (HLA)
- Total Spin
- Spin-Tilt Axis
- Club Speed
- Impact Point
- Angle of Attack
- Club Path
- Delivered Face Angle
- Delivered Lie Angle
- Impact Loft
- Closure Rate
This is for data only. I'd rather leave the discussion of why Uneekor is a preferred device to GCQuad for other threads, such as ability to play TCG2019 or the short game module (which Gene has so graciously given his time to evaluate the system for us). And nothing here re: customer service comparisons, please. Just data.
As a bonus question, has anyone confirmed that the GCHawk cannot measure Club Data at this point? Or has anyone done any testing at all on a GCHawk?
Looking forward to any feedback. Thanks!Comment
-
This might be an unpopular opinion, but I was thinking it would be nice if My Golf Spy could compare the launch monitors. The only thing I remember reading that they did was the Mevo.Comment
-
Has anyone found a comparison to quad/hmt to Uneekor club data yet?? seeing so many reviews but still have not seen thisComment
-
I still havent seen any done yet unfortunately.Comment
-
Funny enough Uneekor themselves state they have done a comparison with superior accuracy to GCQuad/ trackman. Would love to see more detail on the tests they did.
"• Superior accuracy to equivalent sensor technology on the market (Conducted comparison test with GCQuad, Trackman, and About Golf sensors)"Comment
-
I have 104" concrete floor to drywall ceiling. Need 2" for fiberbuilt insert, so really 102" or 8' 6". I've read 9' minimum for uneekor.
At 8' 6", am I better off going gc2, or should uneekor still work fine?Comment
-
You need to verify with Austin at Uneekor, but I believe if you can swing the club and you can angle the cameras to where the field of vision picks up the ball, I think 8' 6" might work....but I am basing that on my ceiling being 9' 4" and knowing the cameras still had plenty of room to pick up the ball....rjd1975 is right about the "optimal window" but in talking to Austin, I believe there is more flexibility.
-
Better check your woods. I'd break my driver on the ceiling at 8'6".Originally posted by NinjaB View PostComment
-
Certainly less hight than I would like. I don't think I want to do anything extreme like dig out the concrete slab of the basement to gain extra height. 3wood seems fine, Driver seems fine, but I think it's close enough that it would mess me up psychologically.Originally posted by Derekfsu View Post
So I will probably not hit driver on it. I'd rather have heating and cooling and no driver, than to put the sim in the garage.Comment
-
I am currently making the decision between the QED and the GC2a/HMT combo. I can actually pick up the GC2a/HMT combo second hand for over £2000 cheaper than the QED. Like you I really do want the video analysis, but then video analysis can always be done with independent software and have it on a separate screen.Originally posted by cmckelvmi View Post
I also like the idea of the Uneekor being on the ceiling and not anywhere near the hitting area.
Still not fully decided, but as I will finish the build in the next 3 weeks I need to make a decision soon.
Comment
-
Unless you need left and right handed play, I would go for the used GC2 with HMT. If you decide you don’t like it, you can always sell it to get your money back out of it. And it gives you the option to take it to the range and use any golf ball you want without adding decals. The dots on the club for the HMT last a very long time and can be skipped if you just want to play a round. You can’t skip the dots on the ball for the uneekor. -
Yeah - think I might do that. Don't need lefty / righty. In fact my space doesn't allow it anyway. Whilst I might lose out on the video of the club hitting the ball , the HMT offers AoA and also the strike point on the clubface.
Also, am I correct in thinking that if I use the savings vs the Uneekor and buy FSX2018 there is built in swing video analysis in that software?
-
-
By teh way - what is the price of FSX2018 in the UK? Anyone know?Comment
Comment