Help with choosing a setup

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ben7e
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2020
    • 20

    #1

    Help with choosing a setup

    Hi all! I am new to the forum and have been reading through the forums here and elsewhere and watching videos for a few weeks. Honestly, I am pretty surprised by the amount of options and I feel like you have to really dig to get some of the information! I work with tech to a decent extent so I am pretty comfortable choosing the hardware from a projector and computer setup and I think I have figured out how I want to lay out the hitting bay. However, I am still in limbo choosing the launch monitor and software. Hopefully some of you can help me decide.

    I've been working on a launch Monitor Pros/Cons list. Quick setup explanation - Building as a gift for my Dad - going in a pole building where space is available for a radar based monitor if that is the way I go. Not looking to go crazy on the expensive side. Basically looking at the most popular options of either Skytrak or Mevo+ but recently found out about ProTee and it seems to offer a lot with the addition of club head data at not a huge upgrade in price. So below are my concerns and reasons for wanting each. Welcoming any advice!

    My research has brought me here. Maybe this will help organize some of this for others as well as encourage some of you to give some feedback on the questions I still have!

    Skytrak
    Pros:
    Popular, low space requirements. Possibly better for chipping and putting than radar systems but putting seems to have its own issues with straightness. If using E6, software is cheaper annually than other options:
    Cons: Slow render time - I could see this being annoying. How much is this reduced by a well-spec'd computer? How well spec'd? If I go 16gb ram with a 3+ghz i7 is this reduced or similar?
    Brother is left handed - requires moving unit. Possible setup issues/annoyances.

    Software costs:
    E6: Standard $300/yr, Deluxe $450/yr, One Time: $2500 (PC)/ $1500(iPad). TGC2019: $895
    + Game Improvement Package: $99/yr.
    Total:
    E6: $299/yr or $2599+$99/yr.
    TGC2019: $895+$99/yr.

    Mevo+:
    Pros: Fast shot data. Comes with 5 courses in E6 Connect for iPad.
    Cons: More space required. Possibly worse chipping and putting data.

    Pro or Con?: My biggest question, possibly positive and also concern with Mevo+: On one hand, it can run everything off of an iPad. It comes with 5 courses on E6 Connect. It seems like maybe this can really handle all of the bases. Do I really need 100's or 1,000s of courses? On the other hand, if I decide to upgrade to the PC version of E6 or TGC2019, the problem I see now is that if I just want good club data (checking gapping for example), I would need to run the Flightscope apps on an iPad and change what device I am connected to which would be annoying. I know the range in TGC doesn't offer a mode to see this info. Is there an option for this in E6?

    Software:
    Free FS Software and 5 courses on E6.
    E6: $2500 + $300/yr - considerably more expensive than if using Skytrak
    TGC2019: $995

    Another Question - it seems like putting is less than ideal on both units. Does this really matter? Do you just set up gimmes inside of a certain distance on both? I think I read you can manually enter putts on E6 but not TGC2019. Is that accurate?

    I know these two units are compared a lot but hopefully my concerns are specific enough to help get some good guidance.
    If you have owned both units, which do you like more and why? Which software do you like better and why?

    ProTee
    I just found out this unit exists. Does not seem as popular and maybe hard to get in the US? Seems less "commercial." Seems to give great data.
    Am I reading correctly here that it is $3149 for TGC + this unit?


    However, I am not seeing it packaged with TGC2019. Is that a thing? Is this unit worth exploring more?

    Appreciate any guidance!

  • Foreman33
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2020
    • 101

    #2
    I will only comment on the software since I have different hardware. I just got my sim up and running a couple weeks ago and I've been impressed with TGC 2019. I was deciding between TGC and E6 and am very happy I went with TGC. I love being able to play so many courses: local courses, courses I've played on trips, and of course the more famous and tour courses. Since many of them are user-made they have some imperfections but overall I've been really happy with them. Maybe the graphics/interface/features are better on E6 (I have no idea), but if they are I'll give up some of that for more courses. And the price point and no subscription is an added bonus.

    Comment

    • fortysixandtwo
      Advanced Member
      • Nov 2015
      • 491

      #3
      I don’t know much about the mevo, I’m sure it’s good if you have the space. Skytrak is pretty reliable and been around for several years so it has it’s issues but the pro’s outweigh the cons. I’m a gc2 user but have used the skytrak and thought it was good. As far as software, I wouldn’t want to use an iPad for anything. If your going to hit into a net and look at an iPad, might as well get a pc and a 4ktv. I’d get a good desktop and a 4ktv, or go the impact screen/projector route. Laptop is a good alternative but you’re kinda stuck with whatever hardware it comes..
      I think tgc2019 has more options for a lot less price. E6 is a pretty big expense on top of a yearly subscription for the courses you’d probably really want to play. Tgc2019 has many great courses that you’ll never see on e6 or in my case fsx2020.

      Good luck, let us know how it works out. it’s enjoyable to be at your own house and be able to play/practice golf.
      Cheers,
      John

      Comment

      • ben7e
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2020
        • 20

        #4
        Originally posted by fortysixandtwo View Post
        I don’t know much about the mevo, I’m sure it’s good if you have the space. Skytrak is pretty reliable and been around for several years so it has it’s issues but the pro’s outweigh the cons. I’m a gc2 user but have used the skytrak and thought it was good. As far as software, I wouldn’t want to use an iPad for anything. If your going to hit into a net and look at an iPad, might as well get a pc and a 4ktv. I’d get a good desktop and a 4ktv, or go the impact screen/projector route. Laptop is a good alternative but you’re kinda stuck with whatever hardware it comes..
        I think tgc2019 has more options for a lot less price. E6 is a pretty big expense on top of a yearly subscription for the courses you’d probably really want to play. Tgc2019 has many great courses that you’ll never see on e6 or in my case fsx2020.

        Good luck, let us know how it works out. it’s enjoyable to be at your own house and be able to play/practice golf.
        Cheers,
        John
        Just to be clear, with any route I'd take, it will be using a projector so even if I used iPad, I would plan to connect to a projector with an impact screen. Sorry if I wasn't clear in that area. Both pieces of software look nice but it seems everyone says to go TGC2019!
        Last edited by ben7e; 12-13-2020, 06:49 PM.

        Comment

        • Sixmudd
          Advanced Member
          • Nov 2020
          • 327

          #5
          Originally posted by ben7e View Post
          Hi all! I am new to the forum and have been reading through the forums here and elsewhere and watching videos for a few weeks. Honestly, I am pretty surprised by the amount of options and I feel like you have to really dig to get some of the information! I work with tech to a decent extent so I am pretty comfortable choosing the hardware from a projector and computer setup and I think I have figured out how I want to lay out the hitting bay. However, I am still in limbo choosing the launch monitor and software. Hopefully some of you can help me decide.

          I've been working on a launch Monitor Pros/Cons list. Quick setup explanation - Building as a gift for my Dad - going in a pole building where space is available for a radar based monitor if that is the way I go. Not looking to go crazy on the expensive side. Basically looking at the most popular options of either Skytrak or Mevo+ but recently found out about ProTee and it seems to offer a lot with the addition of club head data at not a huge upgrade in price. So below are my concerns and reasons for wanting each. Welcoming any advice!

          My research has brought me here. Maybe this will help organize some of this for others as well as encourage some of you to give some feedback on the questions I still have!

          Skytrak
          Pros:
          Popular, low space requirements. Possibly better for chipping and putting than radar systems but putting seems to have its own issues with straightness. If using E6, software is cheaper annually than other options:
          Cons: Slow render time - I could see this being annoying. How much is this reduced by a well-spec'd computer? How well spec'd? If I go 16gb ram with a 3+ghz i7 is this reduced or similar?
          Brother is left handed - requires moving unit. Possible setup issues/annoyances.

          Software costs:
          E6: Standard $300/yr, Deluxe $450/yr, One Time: $2500 (PC)/ $1500(iPad). TGC2019: $895
          + Game Improvement Package: $99/yr.
          Total:
          E6: $299/yr or $2599+$99/yr.
          TGC2019: $895+$99/yr.

          Mevo+:
          Pros: Fast shot data. Comes with 5 courses in E6 Connect for iPad.
          Cons: More space required. Possibly worse chipping and putting data.

          Pro or Con?: My biggest question, possibly positive and also concern with Mevo+: On one hand, it can run everything off of an iPad. It comes with 5 courses on E6 Connect. It seems like maybe this can really handle all of the bases. Do I really need 100's or 1,000s of courses? On the other hand, if I decide to upgrade to the PC version of E6 or TGC2019, the problem I see now is that if I just want good club data (checking gapping for example), I would need to run the Flightscope apps on an iPad and change what device I am connected to which would be annoying. I know the range in TGC doesn't offer a mode to see this info. Is there an option for this in E6?

          Software:
          Free FS Software and 5 courses on E6.
          E6: $2500 + $300/yr - considerably more expensive than if using Skytrak
          TGC2019: $995

          Another Question - it seems like putting is less than ideal on both units. Does this really matter? Do you just set up gimmes inside of a certain distance on both? I think I read you can manually enter putts on E6 but not TGC2019. Is that accurate?

          I know these two units are compared a lot but hopefully my concerns are specific enough to help get some good guidance.
          If you have owned both units, which do you like more and why? Which software do you like better and why?

          ProTee
          I just found out this unit exists. Does not seem as popular and maybe hard to get in the US? Seems less "commercial." Seems to give great data.
          Am I reading correctly here that it is $3149 for TGC + this unit?


          However, I am not seeing it packaged with TGC2019. Is that a thing? Is this unit worth exploring more?

          Appreciate any guidance!
          I’ve had my skytrak for about 3 weeks now. The lag time isn’t too bad (maybe 2-3 seconds). I thought I would be bothered with this too, but really it’s really not a big deal. If your brother though is a lefty and you’re a righty, that’s gonna be real annoying to have to move the unit and align it again every time you switch players. Putting and chipping are absolutely terrible For WGT. Not sure though about TGC2019. There are some growing pains though with skytrak. Lately I have had more “no reads” which is less than ideal. Sometimes takes a while to connect to my network. Annual fees is annoying but I knew that going into it. But for $2k option for launch monitor, I think most of the pros outweigh the cons for a $2k launch monitor

          Comment


          • 3on3putt
            3on3putt commented
            Editing a comment
            I can assure you that the chipping and putting in tgc2019 is nothing like wgt. I gave up on wgt after about a month because I got so frustrated with the short game. It's night and day on tgc.
        • 3on3putt
          Champion Member
          • Mar 2019
          • 1315

          #6
          1. There's no issues with straight putts on skytrak if you turn on the straight putting patch on tgc. Overall, the general consensus seems to be that chipping and putting is better on skytrak as mevo+ seems to struggle with really short chips and putts. That part of the game is actually the skytrak's biggest strength in my opinion. Just a fundamental difference between camera based vs. radar based units. I can hit literally 1 yard chips and they read every time. Chipping and putting is critical for sim play and if I were to do it again I would choose skytrak again for that reason alone. The 2 second delay is not ideal, but you get used to it. Both units are finicky in their own ways. Mevo requires you to put stickers on your ball which I'm assuming you have to keep replacing as you wear out balls. Plus interference issues with metal things and specific space requirements. Probably the biggest thing I don't like about skytrak is how it sits a little out in front of you. You can expect 2 or 3 no reads in 18 holes of sim play. Not the biggest deal in the world but obviously would be better if there weren't any.

          2. If you plan on playing a lot with your lefty brother, mevo is a way better option. I've never played on the skytrak with a lefty but I imagine it's a giant pain in the butt. Is it possible to keep it in right handed mode and just have the lefty swing over the top of the unit? Either way, it's not ideal. I am fortunate not to know any lefties (although I fear my daughter might be lefty which means I'm doomed lol).

          3. E6 vs tgc2019 is no comparison in my opinion. Tgc has better graphics, more courses, the ability to design your own courses and a much bigger community of online tournaments (which is the coolest part of the game). And above all that, is miles cheaper than e6.
          Last edited by 3on3putt; 12-13-2020, 09:50 PM.

          Comment

          • impliciter
            Junior Member
            • Dec 2020
            • 13

            #7
            Originally posted by ben7e View Post
            ProTee
            I just found out this unit exists. Does not seem as popular and maybe hard to get in the US? Seems less "commercial." Seems to give great data.
            Am I reading correctly here that it is $3149 for TGC + this unit?
            https://golfsimulatorstore.com/colle...-base-pack-tgc

            However, I am not seeing it packaged with TGC2019. Is that a thing? Is this unit worth exploring more?

            Appreciate any guidance!
            I think this is hilarious because this forum is hosted by Protee. I just ordered and setup a Protee base TGC pack. I bought it directly from Protee for a decent discount (much cheaper than Skytrack plus TGC). I ordered on a Monday and it was delivered on Thursday from the Netherlands. It's been running great and I'm a little surprised it's not more popular in this price category. My only recommendation would be to get the horizontal camera in addition to the base pack. Flop shots and other high loft short shots can confuse the hardware because the club will obscure the ball passing over the front sensor array. Without the horizontal camera, the horizontal departure angle is calculated by the front array.

            In general, it's much less "plug and play" than Skytrack/Mevo but the support is good and it's quite tweakable. The second major consideration is the Protee sim is much more picky about lighting. You have to control ambient lighting really well (essentially only have the supplied spotlights). This was no problem for me as I wanted it as dark as possible for the projector.

            Comment

            • Brettster
              Extreme Member
              • Aug 2014
              • 921

              #8
              ben7e - the comments by impliciter are spot-on.

              just ordered and setup a Protee base TGC pack. I bought it directly from Protee for a decent discount (much cheaper than Skytrack plus TGC). I ordered on a Monday and it was delivered on Thursday from the Netherlands. It's been running great and I'm a little surprised it's not more popular in this price category. My only recommendation would be to get the horizontal camera in addition to the base pack. Flop shots and other high loft short shots can confuse the hardware because the club will obscure the ball passing over the front sensor array. Without the horizontal camera, the horizontal departure angle is calculated by the front array.

              In general, it's much less "plug and play" than Skytrack/Mevo but the support is good and it's quite tweakable. The second major consideration is the Protee sim is much more picky about lighting. You have to control ambient lighting really well (essentially only have the supplied spotlights). This was no problem for me as I wanted it as dark as possible for the projector.
              I would also add a few things you should consider... you can purchase base-pack II which includes 2 high speed cameras (horizontal/vertical) as well as a putting sensor, not required, but gives you much more data on putting. As long as you can mount your hitting sensor about 9'-10' from screen, you will have about 7'-8' to putt from and get much more accurate putting data then relying on the hitting sensor. I'm about to find all that out, and will post details when I've finished my ProTee setup. I have purchased a used unit. If you do the same, make sure you get one with cameras made after (I think it's Oct. 2017), as those newer cameras are more stable in holding their configuration - you can find posts about that up here and on ProTee support. If you buy a new unit, you have the new cameras.

              Here's the Pros/Cons of ProTee from my opinion (I've played on a ProTee setup prior to purchasing mine - which I am currently involved in finishing out my build):
              ---
              Pros: Excellent support/help in setting up. Fast shot data, and fast render on screen (no delay). Space requirements are decent (so cameras/lights can be placed properly, and more length needed if setting up putting sensor, more width if setup is for both right/left hand players). The best for chipping and putting than all other systems. No marks/dots required on balls . No annual subscriptions required for TGC2019 - one-time purchase. Fast render time. Hitting sensor comes standard with Fiberbuilt mat (easier on wrists and long life, replacements can be purchased). No problems with left/right hand players other than larger width space requirements.
              Cons: Space requirements are a little longer if adding putting sensor, and a little wider if setting up for right/left players, Very specific lighting requirements (IR spotlights). Both sensors must be embedded in floor, requiring raised flooring (3 1/2" or so). Not portable: entire system is unique setup to space, cannot be used outdoors (for example). You're hitting off the impact sensor/mat with holes cut into it so sensors can read club data - the holes bother some people, but they can also be useful, for example dropping in a 'brush tee' to simulate rough.
              ---

              Let me know if you have any other questions... I've played on many of the sims listed up here, and that's what I based my decision on when it came time to purchase. I would suggest if you really want to get the best idea of how any system works for you, consider locating a setup in your local community (though not always easy to do, for example we have one TrueGolf/E6 in a local bar I just found out about several years ago).

              Good luck!
              Last edited by Brettster; 12-13-2020, 11:10 PM.

              Comment

              • ben7e
                Junior Member
                • Dec 2020
                • 20

                #9
                Originally posted by impliciter View Post

                I think this is hilarious because this forum is hosted by Protee. I just ordered and setup a Protee base TGC pack. I bought it directly from Protee for a decent discount (much cheaper than Skytrack plus TGC). I ordered on a Monday and it was delivered on Thursday from the Netherlands. It's been running great and I'm a little surprised it's not more popular in this price category. My only recommendation would be to get the horizontal camera in addition to the base pack. Flop shots and other high loft short shots can confuse the hardware because the club will obscure the ball passing over the front sensor array. Without the horizontal camera, the horizontal departure angle is calculated by the front array.

                In general, it's much less "plug and play" than Skytrack/Mevo but the support is good and it's quite tweakable. The second major consideration is the Protee sim is much more picky about lighting. You have to control ambient lighting really well (essentially only have the supplied spotlights). This was no problem for me as I wanted it as dark as possible for the projector.
                Well, in fairness, this forum is where I found out about Protee but I don't really see it elsewhere as much - social media, YouTube, etc. It does exist there but maybe it is because it has been around longer (not sure if that is true vs. Skytrak). I think also that the look of the product itself is not a refined/branded look. It could very well be the best bang for the buck unit. The issue w/ ambient light could be an issue as the building it will be going in has automatic motion sensor lights. The hitting bay I am planning on building will have tarp sides so it may be dark enough inside but that I may not want to take that risk.

                Comment


                • Brettster
                  Brettster commented
                  Editing a comment
                  I'm not sure your ambient lights would be a problem, I would contact ProTee and ask them, they are very good at answering Customer Support questions very quickly, even before you are a customer. https://csc.protee-united.com/hc/en-...ile_site=false

                  Lighting is also specific with some of the other units... With ProTee it's just a little more restrictive in the type of lights (IR Spots) at very specific positions overhead. This is to help the unit read ball data. Remember, you don't have any dots/stickers on your balls, or clubs like you have to do with many of the other launch monitors. I consider it a very easy trade off to make, for highly accurate data.

                  I've played on a ProTee setup before, and I don't remember it being completely dark, so you can still have some ambient lighting around perimeter likely - and I'm planning on doing that. It's just that over the sensor/hitting mat, and the putting/mat you have IR spotlights shining down. ProTee would have more to say - you could ask them about ambient lighting in the environment, they are very good at answering Customer Support questions very quickly, even before you are a customer. https://csc.protee-united.com/hc/en-...ile_site=false

                  ProTee was one of the first launch monitors, I've been up here on this forum since 2014, so 6 years and I followed SkyTrak release, and Mevo+ release, etc. My issue with SkyTrak is the 2 second delay every shot, and with left/right players would be next to impossible. With Mevo+ it is all radar based and getting correct putting data is hard, and requires very exact length (distance to ball from Mevo+ unit, and to screen from ball for measuring data, also requires dots/balls).
                  Last edited by Brettster; 12-13-2020, 11:45 PM.
              • impliciter
                Junior Member
                • Dec 2020
                • 13

                #10
                Originally posted by ben7e View Post

                Well, in fairness, this forum is where I found out about Protee but I don't really see it elsewhere as much - social media, YouTube, etc. It does exist there but maybe it is because it has been around longer (not sure if that is true vs. Skytrak). I think also that the look of the product itself is not a refined/branded look. It could very well be the best bang for the buck unit. The issue w/ ambient light could be an issue as the building it will be going in has automatic motion sensor lights. The hitting bay I am planning on building will have tarp sides so it may be dark enough inside but that I may not want to take that risk.
                The "hilarious" comment was not intended to be judgmental in any way, especially since I think I found out about Protee in the same way. It was more that there are so few simulators/launch monitors in this price range and yet Protee is not on peoples radar, especially after being on the market for quite some time. It does appear that they are reaching out to partners in the US to improve they're presence.

                Originally posted by Brettster View Post
                ben7e - the comments by impliciter are spot-on.

                I would also add a few things you should consider... you can purchase base-pack II which includes 2 high speed cameras (horizontal/vertical) as well as a putting sensor, not required, but gives you much more data on putting. As long as you can mount your hitting sensor about 9'-10' from screen, you will have about 7'-8' to putt from and get much more accurate putting data then relying on the hitting sensor. I'm about to find all that out, and will post details when I've finished my ProTee setup. I have purchased a used unit. If you do the same, make sure you get one with cameras made after (I think it's Oct. 2017), as those newer cameras are more stable in holding their configuration - you can find posts about that up here and on ProTee support. If you buy a new unit, you have the new cameras.

                Here's the Pros/Cons of ProTee from my opinion (I've played on a ProTee setup prior to purchasing mine - which I am currently involved in finishing out my build):
                ---
                Pros: Excellent support/help in setting up. Fast shot data, and fast render on screen (no delay). Space requirements are decent (so cameras/lights can be placed properly, and more length needed if setting up putting sensor, more width if setup is for both right/left hand players). The best for chipping and putting than all other systems. No marks/dots required on balls . No annual subscriptions required for TGC2019 - one-time purchase. Fast render time. Hitting sensor comes standard with Fiberbuilt mat (easier on wrists and long life, replacements can be purchased). No problems with left/right hand players other than larger width space requirements.
                Cons: Space requirements are a little longer if adding putting sensor, and a little wider if setting up for right/left players, Very specific lighting requirements (IR spotlights). Both sensors must be embedded in floor, requiring raised flooring (3 1/2" or so). Not portable: entire system is unique setup to space, cannot be used outdoors (for example). You're hitting off the impact sensor/mat with holes cut into it so sensors can read club data - the holes bother some people, but they can also be useful, for example dropping in a 'brush tee' to simulate rough.
                ---

                Let me know if you have any other questions... I've played on many of the sims listed up here, and that's what I based my decision on when it came time to purchase. I would suggest if you really want to get the best idea of how any system works for you, consider locating a setup in your local community (though not always easy to do, for example we have one TrueGolf/E6 in a local bar I just found out about several years ago).

                Good luck!
                Putting has been fine off the main sensor mat for me. I have mine setup pretty close to the screen so don't have room for the putting sensor. I'm not sure how it could make putting anymore enjoyable but it may be a bit more accurate. My recommendation would be for the TGC base pack and potentially buy the horizontal camera down the road. The $5k for the base pack II puts it closer to considering other launch monitors.

                I would add the fiberbuilt mat as sort of a neutral/con for me. Protee recommends only hitting from the tee position although others have argued that you don't have to. The rubber tee holder that is included is pretty short so by default, the ball sits down in the hole/divot and you need to use a tee to hit flush with the turf. I think I found an easy solution to this by getting a longer rubber tee holder so that the ball sits up a bit more. It's not a huge deal but replacement turf are over $400. The positive way of looking at it is that you don't need to buy a nice hitting surface as that is included in the simulator.



                Comment


                • impliciter
                  impliciter commented
                  Editing a comment
                  Brettster, ​I don't have a horizontal camera so I have to hit from the tee position, otherwise, at the very least, my ball departure angle (horizontal) would be incorrect as it's calculated using the front sensor array. I still don't understand how hitting in a forward position works. I know it works and will generate a ball launch. I suppose it is possible that the software can listen for the impact audio and work backwards. However, I assume the club path and face angles are calculated based on a known starting ball position which should be the tee. Speaking of horizontal cameras, is this the "new version"?


                  I replaced my rubber tee holder with one that is 2in tall. It sets the ball up about 1/8-1/4in above the turf which is a pretty good position for most of my shots. The "hole" didn't bother me too much but the fiber plugs in the mat directly behind the tee position started falling out after very minimal use, maybe a few hundred swings. After a few more uses, all the fibers in those plugs fell out so there is nothing to really hold the ball in the tee position. I reached out to Protee to see what they can do. They said they don't have any turf tops in stock (expect some in January) and they didn't say whether it would be a warranty replacement. I understand it is a "wear" item but it lasted less than a month which I think is abnormal.

                  I'm going to give an aftermarket turf top a try at least until I can get a replacement from Protee:

                • Brettster
                  Brettster commented
                  Editing a comment
                  impliciter - that looks like the right horizontal camera, just run it by ProTee before you purchase. I know the Point Grey were the old ones, which apparently had some problems holding configuration and had to be adjusted frequently, the newer ones do not have that problem. I see that new camera is around $500, if you add in the putting sensor $995, would get you up there close to $5K - I think ProTee themselves sell remanufactured / reconditioned units also but you would have to talk to them. There support is excellent, and they can even help you set that camera up over the phone on a live link - speak to Jamie at ProTeeUK, he's up here in the forums - but quite busy.

                  I didn't know that about how if you are missing horizontal camera it calculates from the front sensor array - but I see how that makes sense. I want to have as much accuracy as I can get - so I'll be mounting the horizontal camera directly over the hitting sensor at the required spot. I think some people think this is a pain but many other camera based systems, and IR systems require very specific lighting, and most of those also require sticker 'dots' all over your balls/and even your clubs, which I do not find something I'm going to want to mess with - not only is this a messy way of handling it and you are applying dots all the time, those dots can leave marks on your screen too. Not for me, just let me hit a ball, off a mat that is as close to real grass as possible (and does not hurt my wrists) and I'll be fine.

                  I also like that it will not hurt my wrists (such as FiberBuilt that comes built into the ProTee). I should let you know too - that I've played on several other indoor Bar/Sims setups the last 10 years or so, and every time, except when I played on the ProTee/FiberBuilt, I would come home and tell my wife 'my wrists are killing me', and it would be like that for days, so I know FiberBuilt is the only choice for me as far as mats go. Funny you showed me that aftermarket TurfTop, as I have that one, as well as 3 others that I received when I bought my first Used/Unit. That one, the guy had purchased several other aftermarket mats to try out, trying to get the right feel as he liked to pick it off the turf. Everyone has their own preferences. I'm surprised that the fiber plugs pulled out of your mat - it does look like you can get 2 replacement FiberBuilt mats for $400 USD that should hold you for quite a while.

                  Keep in touch my friend... are you in UK?

                • impliciter
                  impliciter commented
                  Editing a comment
                  Brettster I'm in the US. I think I will end up sticking with the fiberbuilt in the end. I hope Protee sticks behind the product and sends a replacement. They haven't really committed to anything. I'm just learning to play and I appreciate how much the Fiberbuilt punishes fat shots. You can get away with some bad shots off more rigid turf tops. I think it is important, especially when starting out, to make good contact and not "skip" the club into the ball.

                  I'll probably order a horizontal camera when I get the replacement turf. Right now, as I'm learning, I'm probably spending more time analyzing swings with video replay than actually playing sim golf. It's not as fun but it seems to be a great use of the setup.
              • ben7e
                Junior Member
                • Dec 2020
                • 20

                #11
                If purchasing TGC2019, am I missing something or can you only buy the sim versions from 3rd party sellers?
                Also, if I have Steam on my computer and just want an extra copy say to design courses for fun, if I make a course on the steam version, that can import into the sim version, correct?

                Comment

                • impliciter
                  Junior Member
                  • Dec 2020
                  • 13

                  #12
                  Originally posted by ben7e View Post
                  If purchasing TGC2019, am I missing something or can you only buy the sim versions from 3rd party sellers?
                  Also, if I have Steam on my computer and just want an extra copy say to design courses for fun, if I make a course on the steam version, that can import into the sim version, correct?
                  Protee United is the company that licensed the video game version (from HB Studios) and adapted the game for sim use. You can buy it directly from Protee United here:


                  For Skytrak, you need to buy from the Skytrak store.

                  I imagine you could use the game version on PC to design courses but I haven't tested it. I was actually playing with it yesterday wondering the same thing.

                  Comment


                  • 3on3putt
                    3on3putt commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Yes, you can design courses on the PC version and upload for sim play.

                  • gojoholo
                    gojoholo commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Yes. I build my courses on the PC version and play them on the SIM version. I believe I have read that if you build/publish on the SIM version they do *not* get published to the pc version.
                • ben7e
                  Junior Member
                  • Dec 2020
                  • 20

                  #13
                  Thanks all!
                  What about metal surfaces with Mevo+? How close of proximity can cause an issue. As this is going in a pole building, the sides and roof are metal. Is that going to wreak havoc or will my hitting bay provide enough separation to use a radar system?

                  Comment

                  • impliciter
                    Junior Member
                    • Dec 2020
                    • 13

                    #14
                    EDIT as I posting in the wrong thread

                    Comment

                    • ben7e
                      Junior Member
                      • Dec 2020
                      • 20

                      #15
                      Originally posted by ben7e View Post

                      Mevo+:

                      Software:
                      Free FS Software and 5 courses on E6.
                      E6: $2500 + $300/yr - considerably more expensive than if using Skytrak
                      TGC2019: $995

                      Just wanted to correct myself here since I don't think I can edit the OP.
                      Mevo+ also waives the $2500 E6 fee so it is $300/yr as well.

                      Comment

                      Working...