Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GSA vs. Protee Simulator research

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GSA vs. Protee Simulator research

    In one of my earlier postings I was talking about labeling and putting together a list of sims from top to bottom I am now doing some research on this and starting the process I will take that data, options for the sim and price points with ratings and where they are on a top to bottom list and send it to Bubba I hope and have him pick it apart. So my question is this I was looking into the GSA system that Keither owns and its very close to a Protee. But I see that GSA are advancing there system on cameras and new mats trying to always improve on and grow, what is the thought or expectations for Protee owners, is anything in Research and development to improve this system. I know there is a point that how much is to much but I do not think we are there for a Protee yet, I think that if this is it for protee on the system what is going to happen a couple years from now as everyone is moving forward, ES16, the GC2 with HMT and more is on the way.
    Last edited by aeroburner; 11-17-2016, 03:48 PM.

  • #31
    GSA is similar to protee for chipping. lighting plays a big part in picking up high LA shots. I can pick up as high as 54 LA. I don't dare try more as I am getting close to the lighting after 56 degree LA. I did have to add some extra lighting to increase my FOV that much. For short chips, I can only speak for GSA. I can chip as short as 3 or 4 yards.

    Comment

    Working...
    X