Likelihood of club tracking to come beside skypro?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bennyg211
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 113

    #16
    not so, the cameras track the ball and not the club. just like GC2. there is a reason that Foresight produced a HMT unit with additional cameras, or the new quad with four cameras.

    Comment


    • SkyTrak_Seth
      SkyTrak_Seth commented
      Editing a comment
      I was just going to say that

    • bennyg211
      bennyg211 commented
      Editing a comment
      Hey, I'm as happy for you LM wizards to pull rabbits out of a hat anytime you like, just figured that would be a bit of a stretch without some additional cameras. I'm still hoping that is a dream that might become a reality down a line a little via a nice little add on unit.
  • Clevited
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 241

    #17
    Originally posted by bennyg211 View Post
    not so, the cameras track the ball and not the club. just like GC2. there is a reason that Foresight produced a HMT unit with additional cameras, or the new quad with four cameras.
    So you don't think there is a way to trigger the cameras to also capture the club? Obviously its not as ideal as a separate unit but I don't understand how it doesn't have the hardware unless you show me what you mean.

    I own a high speed camera, i can capture both the ball and club in the same picture. I can calculate quite easily ball speed, and club speed. Its accuracy is reliant on frame rate and how well I measure a reference point. With a higher res camera and higher frame rate, I could, in theory, calculate those much more easily, and even perhaps some information about swing path.

    Comment


    • goatbarn
      goatbarn commented
      Editing a comment
      There is a reason why the HMT is angled back towards the ball too. Angle closer to perpendicular = more accurate measurements, especially on club face and impact location.
  • Clevited
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 241

    #18
    I agree, the hmt add on for gc2 is built for best accuracy, especially for strike location, my point was, that I feel Skytrak "could" measure at least some club parameters potentially quite accurately with what it has built in. That would be awesome to me, no added cost, just added functionality through software capabilities.

    In my mind, unless its impossible to get the cameras to also capture images of the club, which could be true, parameters such as club speed, angle of attack, and path (in or out), could be seen and calculated through software much like it does with the ball itself.

    It will probably double the calc time though if it could lol.

    Comment


    • bennyg211
      bennyg211 commented
      Editing a comment
      i'm not meaning to be a tool, but I fail to see how you could get any meaningful data from the ball cameras? I think the point is when and where the cameras actually capture data and I think you'll find the club head is generally nowhere near the field of view, certainly for both cameras. Look at how far forward the unit is to the ball, you'll never see a path or AoA if somehow you could see the club head at some point as all those events have occurred well before those cameras see a thing.

    • jut111
      jut111 commented
      Editing a comment
      Of course. It's common sense. By the time your club enters the Skytraks field of view, it's been deflected by the ball and ground and is well into the follow through. Any data it could collect would be utterly useless.
  • Clevited
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2017
    • 241

    #19
    I do not know what the cameras can see, my assumption is that it can see the ball tee'd up, perhaps not, that is a technical issue I do not know the answer to. All I know is if i bump the ball off the tee, it will sometimes act as if i hit the ball and it delays to see if the pictures show a hit shot? There are sensors and what not I assume that are mixed in there. If you are familiar with what it can see or not see, then that would be the technical clarification I would need to ditch any hope for added functionality.

    Comment


    • bennyg211
      bennyg211 commented
      Editing a comment
      ok, so you have some triggering sensors that get triggered when the club passes through and this gives the camera the call to fire will a known delay/latency. The club hits the ball and then the ball takes off. At some put during the ball ascending it appears in the first camera window and then onto the second camera window. I don't know how many images are taken with each camera. i don't believe the club head is in the frame for most shots. Nor do I believe that the camera sees or evaluates the ball when it is tee'd, merely at some point during its travel. Hence needing to shift the ball forward or backwards depending on loft.
  • Jwheels9876
    Champion Member
    • Jul 2016
    • 1286

    #20
    I have a Skypro that I use occasionally, but what's the point of using it in TGC? Am I supposed to take it off after each shot and put it on the next club or are we talking about just using it in the skytrak app for practice and data?

    Comment

    • RyanP
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2017
      • 14

      #21
      They should just add an additional camera add on option for club data. Like HMT does, Charge another $1500 for the add on feature Or just integrate a pro tee style mat. Can't be that hard for people who work with this kind of technology already. Obviously people want it..

      GC2 charging an extra 6 grand for HMT or the ridiculous price of the QCquad is insane. Skytrack is less than 1/3rd the cost of a new GC2 for something nearly as accurate. Don't see why they couldn't add the club data most people want for 1/3rd the cost of Foresight as well. Probably put them out of business if they got it fine tuned a little better.

      Comment


      • bennyg211
        bennyg211 commented
        Editing a comment
        Well, we're all hoping. I'm sure they are looking at all potential revenue streams. Be a crazy business if they didn't. if a HMT option came out, then I cant see a PGA teaching pro without an LM, there would be no excuse.
    • Clevited
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2017
      • 241

      #22
      Benny,

      That could very well be how it works but maybe to illustrate what I am thinking I have posted Skytrak's picture of what I assumed was its viewing field with the cameras. I do doubt the possibility they would or could enable their camera system to obtain any useful data regarding the club, just wishing is all.

      Comment

      • Bill Huston
        Junior Member
        • May 2016
        • 16

        #23
        I actually don't think it's a big deal. We can see the angle the ball takes off at and the spin and see what the ball is doing via tracker trace. It's not hard to figure out what the club head was doing. Am I missing something?

        Comment


        • jerry3
          jerry3 commented
          Editing a comment
          Angle of attack and club head speed. it would also be great to see dynamic llie/loft, angle of attack, ball impact on the face etc, basically everything hmt does
      • Shardak
        Super Member
        • Oct 2015
        • 513

        #24
        I hope they add some sort of club tracking that does does not involve Skypro.

        - I have had 2 skypro's and they both stopped working after a couple months. Check the amazon reviews page for them, lots of people with the same issue. I think they cannot stand up to the shock of impact for very long.

        - Having to move the Skypro between clubs, and recalibrate it, would make it very annoying to use in anything other than practice on the Skytrak range.

        I would like them to release something stand-alone, not something that attaches to your club. And of course getting this data in Skytrak and passed to the various simulator API's would be nice.



        Comment


        • jerry3
          jerry3 commented
          Editing a comment
          my skypro has recently stopped working as well. I was hoping for integration with the R-Motion, or even better a second camera like hmt
      • jut111
        Member
        • Aug 2016
        • 89

        #25
        The one thing skypro does very well is putting analysis. I'd think this would be a good add on on it's own to make sim play more realistic.

        Comment

        • agresset
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2014
          • 12

          #26
          Is this real?

          Cross post from http://golfsimulatorforum.com/forum/...what-the-frick but seen on http://xn--24-zh4arfne.com/ and https://mygspi.com/gtrak/

          Comment

          • AndyF
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2015
            • 114

            #27

            Comment

            • YonexMan
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2015
              • 124

              #28
              hmmm I just purchased a re-furbished Skypro directly from the company through their ebay store in the USA. So far it is working fine. Agree, it is great for putting. I bought it because of the problems I've had with Swingbyte. Several straps and clips breaking. Swingbyte itself still works, but the last thing that broke was the strap mount on the case itself. Swingbyte said for me to buy another swingbyte - wouldn't supply me with another case - even after saying I would pay for it. So I bought the Skypro instead as it was way cheaper. Here's hoping it doesn't break as well..

              Comment

              • KerrHughes
                Member
                • Mar 2017
                • 75

                #29
                I've owned a Zepp and currently own a Garmin Truswing. If Skytrak was to implement the Skypro into the app I would definitely purchase one.

                Comment

                Working...