SKYTRAK vs MEVO+ - DRIVER! Compared to UNEEKOR QED

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • a98cr125
    Advanced Member
    • Aug 2018
    • 484

    #1

    SKYTRAK vs MEVO+ - DRIVER! Compared to UNEEKOR QED

  • Morini
    Super Member
    • Dec 2017
    • 742

    #2
    I put Uneekoor data from the shot at 5:20 into flightscope optimizer. 750 feet of elevation and got 245 yards carry, pretty well in line with the other two. I did that because I didn't expect 147 ball speed to carry 261.7. Something is going on. It could be a flawed Uneekor ball flight model, or elevation or wind is somehow involved. Or did I miss something? I doubt Uneekor would go out with a severely flawed model.
    Last edited by Morini; 05-25-2020, 03:20 AM.

    Comment

    • Morini
      Super Member
      • Dec 2017
      • 742

      #3
      One other thing. The ball speed is right at the edge of the speed where the Skytrak high ball speed fix will make a difference. The fix was included in latest update, so available for Skytrak range, but as far as I know, it has not been implemented on E6 or TGC2019 yet. I don't know if it makes any difference at this speed. Probably not much.

      Comment

      • DS12
        Advanced Member
        • Mar 2020
        • 252

        #4
        I thought E6 used the Skytrak flight model until it hit the ground, the E6 physics from there. Could be wrong on that though

        Comment


        • Morini
          Morini commented
          Editing a comment
          That is correct. However, E6 still hasn't integrated the latest image engine. At least not as far as I know. In other words, the update hasn't trickled out yet.
      Working...