Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bushnell Launch Pro

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bushnell Launch Pro

    Any one have any tidbits about the Bushnell? Looks like it is Foresight sold under Bushnell brand. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...301338047.html

  • #31
    I've hit balls many times on Trackman (indoors) and GC2 (indoors). I've owned both SkyTrak and Mevo+ that I used in my limited flight (6-10') outdoor setup and I can say with confidence that radar (in a limited flight setup) is inaccurate even if you're willing to spend $20k. That said, radar becomes more and more accurate with the amount of space you afford it.

    I would only consider a camera based system for my usage so the news that this new system could be a more current GC2 is beyond exciting. Hoping I can get basic range functionality for $3k.

    Comment


    • bubbtubbs
      bubbtubbs commented
      Editing a comment
      GC3 is the non-USA name for the Launch Pro launch monitor. FSX is Foresight's proprietary software suite.

      https://golfsimulatorforum.com/forum...resight-sports new information starts around page 5.
      Last edited by bubbtubbs; 08-27-2021, 09:34 PM. Reason: Added link

    • patexan
      patexan commented
      Editing a comment
      I was afraid of that pricing but sounds about right. It will end up being a between the GC2 and the GC4 and more like the GC2 with HMT. There was no way this was ever going to be close to $2k or $3k.

    • bubbtubbs
      bubbtubbs commented
      Editing a comment
      It's actually a fair bit cheaper than GC2 if you take into account that HMT club data (as far as I'm aware) needs Foresight software and used GC2 without a software suite run around 6000 used and a certified pre-owned GC2+HMT with FSX is around 20k Canadian.

      There's no information on third party software compatibility at this point, but I'd guess it's not great. If all you're after is ball data and want TGC2019, GC2 is still the clear winner.

  • #32
    Any new news on the Launch Pro, or even the launch of the Launch Pro?

    Comment


    • #33
      There's a video in the Foresight forum section. No new information on price or release date though.

      Comment


      • #34
        Silver and Gold FSX subscription options; Windows PC system required with minium 1050 Ti graphics card
        Silver comes with 5 courses
        Gold comes with 10 courses

        No idea on pricing

        Comment


        • #35
          Foresight Sports provides our FSX2020 Download and Installation Guide to walk you through the steps to download and install your FSX2020 software.


          Someone on GolfWRX posted this first

          Comment


          • bubbtubbs
            bubbtubbs commented
            Editing a comment
            That's interesting, though without pricing and the information on the cost of the unit it's not all that useful yet.

          • six7red
            six7red commented
            Editing a comment
            Interesting, along with what little information we can get from the GC3 teaser posted to Youtube it seems like the Bushnell Launch Pro will be the "low" cost to entry unit and require a subscription while the GC3 will be more expensive and include the FSX software. Excited for the release of more info and pricing

        • #36
          Originally posted by DS12 View Post
          Silver and Gold FSX subscription options; Windows PC system required with minium 1050 Ti graphics card
          Silver comes with 5 courses
          Gold comes with 10 courses

          No idea on pricing
          Ugh, this seems to imply we’re still going to have to buy most of the real courses individually, right? Even without knowing the prices, this is not very appealing. Have been going back and forth as to how much I would actually use the portability aspect of the launch pro vs. the R/L ease of use (which I also don’t really need right now) in something like the eyexo. Given that the vast majority of my use will be right-handed in the garage, though, I think being forced to sign up for some level of FSX instead of the open nature of the Uneekors is going to end up being the tie-breaker for me.

          Comment


          • bubbtubbs
            bubbtubbs commented
            Editing a comment
            If you have the space you can always put the GC unit on a swivel in the center of the stance mat and pivot it instead of moving it back and forth. The overhead units are a more elegant solution, though.

          • blockfade
            blockfade commented
            Editing a comment
            Sorry for the slow reply Bechs. No, not really considering the GC2 at this point. My skytrak works fine for me for now — not worth switching to tech that is no longer supported (answer would be different if I were starting from scratch). If the software options aren’t good for the GC3, will probably just wait until I’m able to upgrade to the EYEXO.

          • Bechs
            Bechs commented
            Editing a comment
            Yep, the non-supported nature of the GC2 concerned me as well. It just feels like the best method of keeping accuracy but getting around FSX limitations on the cheap

            I did look into the swivel bubbtubbs, but yeah the width meant someone misses on comfortable driver swings. Those extra couple of feet! argh. EYEXO can work with some ceiling modification, just weighing up the value add. Hard to do until the full GC3 details come out.

        • #37
          Are the Foresight units positioned in a place that makes them vulnerable to a shank, or toe hit? How sturdy are they?

          Comment


          • Gresh12
            Gresh12 commented
            Editing a comment
            They are roughly 2’ from ball out at 45 degrees so they can be hit. I saw a Taylarmade video where they had the pros doing Happy Gilmore swings and Rory smoked the quad with a ball at full driver speed. Seemed no worse for wear afterwards.

          • bubbtubbs
            bubbtubbs commented
            Editing a comment
            I believe it has the same shank protection as the Quad but nothing official on it yet.

        • #38
          I saw that video too. Rory and his buddies were laughing about. I, on the other hand, would be crying like a baby. Also, Rory had to try to duplicate Happy's swing to plunk the Quad, but I can do it without going out of my way. Not that I expect it hit it, but I also never expect a shank. Just happens.

          Comment


          • #39
            Here is a link on the topic with respect to the Quad.


            Hi, I have reviewed several threads discussing GC2 and protective covers and how the risk of hitting the machine is low but not zero. I cannot find a thread discussing the GCQ. Am I missing something obvious? Is it built to withstand an impact? Thanks - Jason



            I also remember a post with pics of a unit (can’t remember if it was a Quad, but believe it was actual a GC2 that took a direct hit and did not look too good after). I will see if I can find that one.



            Comment


            • #40
              Enjoy your 800/yr subscription fees for simulation and club data.

              Comment


              • #41
                HI Everyone

                Yes, this won't sell very well in my view.

                If it was 3k, plus 500 bucks a year sub for everything (including access to all courses for sim play) it would kill everything skytrak, mevo plus, eyexo etc... everything.

                Subscription Model chosen as is, will make this thing very difficult and tricky to resell, which is what foresight want. NO SECOND HAND MARKET for GC3.

                Foresight HATE the used market for GC2 and won't support it anymore.

                Maybe keep skytrak for sim play and buy gc3 for 3k with basic subscriptionfor range use, but will basic ball data tell me something i don't already know?

                I'll just sit on the fence for a while.

                Comment


                • HappyGilmore102
                  HappyGilmore102 commented
                  Editing a comment
                  Hi bubbtubbs

                  I can't see this being 800 ALL IN.

                  What about those using Quad and Hawk who paid big money for their courses, won't they be upset about this?

                  I personally can't play sim golf if its not something like TGC with world rankings and competitions.

                  But hey, if i'm wrong, i'm wrong, we'll know soon for sure.

                • bubbtubbs
                  bubbtubbs commented
                  Editing a comment
                  HappyGilmore102 i have no interest in paying any subscription fees so I haven't been following what is/isn't included, beyond the overall price points, though Foresight's history concerning their software suggests you're likely on the right track.

                  If I got one, my intention would be to purchase the $7k GC3 unit and never spend another cent on it except for the occasionally super-discounted courses Foresight offers. But, if I'm being honest, I'm probably just end up with an EyeXO anyway when I upgrade.

                • Bubba22
                  Bubba22 commented
                  Editing a comment
                  Not a big fan of subscription but to each's own. 7G is a good price for the full pay unit as it basically upgrades the GC2 technology at a similar price.
              Working...
              X