I've recently started working on my first simulator setup in my garage. It's semi-permanent, consisting of archery baffle netting on a curtain track (the kind you find in hospitals). Next stage is choosing the launch monitor...
I was going to go with Skytrak, but decided to wait until the PGA Merchandise Show to see if there were any new products. And wow, the Flightscope Mevo+ looks amazing! I have sufficient room to use its "short indoor" mode. But there might still be a problem...
I am well aware of the fact that radar-based launch monitors struggle indoors, and that small metal dots are used to improve the spin measurement. Remember that word, "metal"...
Behind my net is a huge sheet of metal, commonly known as a garage door π±. I fear that the microwave signal reflected back from the door will swamp the signal reflected from the ball. Are my fears justified?
I researched microwave absorber products, and realised I could end up spending more on these than I would on the Mevo+ π. Water is an excellent absorber of microwaves, so that offers a much more economical option, if I can just work out how to build something which will provide a barrier of an inch or two depth of water between the net and the door.
Has anyone looked into doing something like this?
All ideas gratefully accepted!
Alan.
I was going to go with Skytrak, but decided to wait until the PGA Merchandise Show to see if there were any new products. And wow, the Flightscope Mevo+ looks amazing! I have sufficient room to use its "short indoor" mode. But there might still be a problem...
I am well aware of the fact that radar-based launch monitors struggle indoors, and that small metal dots are used to improve the spin measurement. Remember that word, "metal"...
Behind my net is a huge sheet of metal, commonly known as a garage door π±. I fear that the microwave signal reflected back from the door will swamp the signal reflected from the ball. Are my fears justified?
I researched microwave absorber products, and realised I could end up spending more on these than I would on the Mevo+ π. Water is an excellent absorber of microwaves, so that offers a much more economical option, if I can just work out how to build something which will provide a barrier of an inch or two depth of water between the net and the door.
Has anyone looked into doing something like this?
All ideas gratefully accepted!
Alan.

Comment