And lets see how many of us fall into the long hittter band .....
For some perspective heres the average mens driving length according to yahoo.
Club Men short-medium-long
Driver 200-230-260
3-wood 180-215-235
5-wood 170-195-210
I'm sure we will see that Optishot owners happen to be longer hitters than average!
I still think its fairer for everyone to reduce their woods to 85%.
Or we need to ask everyone what their real driving distances are & maybe emphasising what an average means too! It has to factor in all the bad tee shots! I think we will all be able to spot the bullshitters out there especially with video evidence of their swings.
So for me, i'd say
D 240
3 220
5 205
of course i do hit these clubs longer but including the mishits these numbers would be the average, I do hit 300yd drives on ocassion but we have to put the ego to one side and accept the numbers will be lower than we'd like, so id encourage everyone to err on the lower side than the higher.
Contrast these numbers with optishot
D 285 x0.85 = 242
3 250 x0.90 = 225
5 230 x0.90 = 207
However factoring 85% and 90% the numbers work pretty close.
I dont know why DD dont factor ths lack of ball spin into their algorithms, perhaps it suits their target market but until they do i suggest we should all use an agreed % (like we do today 100%).
For some perspective heres the average mens driving length according to yahoo.
Club Men short-medium-long
Driver 200-230-260
3-wood 180-215-235
5-wood 170-195-210
I'm sure we will see that Optishot owners happen to be longer hitters than average!
I still think its fairer for everyone to reduce their woods to 85%.
Or we need to ask everyone what their real driving distances are & maybe emphasising what an average means too! It has to factor in all the bad tee shots! I think we will all be able to spot the bullshitters out there especially with video evidence of their swings.
So for me, i'd say
D 240
3 220
5 205
of course i do hit these clubs longer but including the mishits these numbers would be the average, I do hit 300yd drives on ocassion but we have to put the ego to one side and accept the numbers will be lower than we'd like, so id encourage everyone to err on the lower side than the higher.
Contrast these numbers with optishot
D 285 x0.85 = 242
3 250 x0.90 = 225
5 230 x0.90 = 207
However factoring 85% and 90% the numbers work pretty close.
I dont know why DD dont factor ths lack of ball spin into their algorithms, perhaps it suits their target market but until they do i suggest we should all use an agreed % (like we do today 100%).
Comment