Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FIRST EVER Mevo+ vs QED vs Skytrak all at ONCE?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FIRST EVER Mevo+ vs QED vs Skytrak all at ONCE?

    This was a ton of work and honestly so much going on at once tough to focus on hitting the ball lol. What do you think?

  • #2
    This is super cool. Thank you.

    I’d love to see a Trackman 4 Vs GC2/GCQuad vs Uneekor ... just saying lol

    Comment


    • a98cr125
      a98cr125 commented
      Editing a comment
      All kinds of things in the works but it's been a waterfall in a pin hole lately LOL Trying to balance it all haha. Thanks for watching!

  • #3
    The various technologies make something like this possible and I think it is great!

    appreciate it.

    Comment


    • a98cr125
      a98cr125 commented
      Editing a comment
      Thank you for watching! Glad you liked it. Please subscribe if you have not yet

  • #4
    Great video. I would like to see skytrak moved so you could take out variable of it interfering with M+ unit. Seems like M+ was definitely reading less side spin. I did notice on short irons M+ read consistently longer than QED but on long irons M+ read consistently shorter than QED. I would like to see driver comparison between QED and M+ in future. Keep it up, good info.

    Comment


    • a98cr125
      a98cr125 commented
      Editing a comment
      I have done comparisons already Mevo+ vs QED they are in the Channel. Thanks for watching.

  • #5
    Okay Jay, now I have to cancel my cable as all I’m doing is watching your YouTube channel at night!! Lol 😆. Looking forward to the driver comparison. Make sure you hit a few toe shots please. I know you can do it.....

    Comment


    • a98cr125
      a98cr125 commented
      Editing a comment
      Glad you are enjoying it. I will try some toe shots lol. I might miss HAHA. My toe shots on not usually on purpose LOL

  • #6
    I haven't re-watched a bunch of videos to confirm this, but it seems like the missed reads on the Mevo+ when doing short chipping might be dependent on how much follow through there is with the club. When there is less follow-through, the club doesn't get as high and decelerates while still between the mevo+ and the ball, and maybe that's interfering with the radar readings on the ball. I don't have my device yet, but if you just take a practice swing without hitting the ball, I'm assuming the device doesn't read. Maybe it's seeing these as practice swings if it can't get a good read on the ball due to the club not following through. I recall watching several videos shortly after the Mevo+ came out and this seemed to be the case.

    For example, your shot at ~18:00, it looks like you decelerate the club and stop the follow-through early, leaving the club about 1 foot off the floor. The subsequent shot at ~18:50 (with slightly longer carry), you have a lot more follow through and don't decelerate the club nearly as fast.

    Interested to see if you have any thoughts around this considering the time you have spent with the system.
    Last edited by farFromScratch; 05-21-2020, 06:22 PM.

    Comment


    • a98cr125
      a98cr125 commented
      Editing a comment
      I have not paid attention to that at all. I know that you need to be careful even on Trackman not to Ghost putts blocking the ball with your putter. So it is possible I would say?

  • #7
    Also have to remember the wind factor on QED and Skytrak, they could account for the slight carry differences

    Comment


    • #8
      Originally posted by jvh42 View Post
      Also have to remember the wind factor on QED and Skytrak, they could account for the slight carry differences
      From Ron's GungHoGolf comparison between TGC and E6 Connect, E6 uses the ball flight model from both Skytrak and Mevo+ resulting in next to no environmental impact. Once the ball hits the ground, the E6 physics take over. Based off this information, I don't think the wind has an affect on Skytrak numbers.

      Comment


      • a98cr125
        a98cr125 commented
        Editing a comment
        I was kind of assuming this too but wanted to be sure. I was using Uneekor data just like Skytrak and Mevo+ would to send to E6 so would essentially mean level playing field.

      • DS12
        DS12 commented
        Editing a comment
        Ron only mentioned Mevo+ and Skytrak didn't have environmental impact, but Uneekor might have. Although after watching the video, and seeing Uneekor was usually the longest into a headwind, I'd guess Uneekor didn't have wind affect ball flight either

    • #9
      This was extremely well done Jay. Thanks for the great content.

      Comment


      • a98cr125
        a98cr125 commented
        Editing a comment
        Thanks for watching!

    • #10
      Seems like spin access was way off on the mevo, was anyone else seeing that?

      Comment


      • pwade3
        pwade3 commented
        Editing a comment
        If your referring to the Mevo+ showing a right spin axis all the time when the other units are showing left, E6 has it labeled backwards for Flightscope. If it shows a L for left, it is actually right. It needs to be corrected.
        It’s correct for Uneekor and ST.

    • #11
      Awesome. Can't wait for the driver comparison. Thanks much!

      Comment


      • a98cr125
        a98cr125 commented
        Editing a comment
        Thanks for watching!

    • #12
      Very consistent with my observations that SkyTrak reads spin axis a bit high and Mevo+ a bit low (not saying QED is perfect but my guess is that tech should have best chance at spin indoors).

      I’m definitely curious on longer clubs. I decided not to bother with another comparison today vs TM4 until I get .09 firmware as I think I’ve got right bias issues with less lofted clubs for now.

      Comment


      • a98cr125
        a98cr125 commented
        Editing a comment
        Putting is being uploaded today. Driver and chipping coming. Trying not to make the videos too long. Thanks for watching!
    Working...
    X