I’ve had my Skytrak for 1.5 years. It rarely misses a shot and I think it’s accurate when you cut it a bit of slack for price. I’ve hit mine outside to watch shape and inside with Trackman and it’s not perfect but it’s darn good.
Is a GC2 better. Sure but I’d personally struggle to pay that much for one right now. While it’s proven and solid it’s old technology at this point. I’m holding out for a unit that’s around $5k that does good ball and club data before I upgrade as the little gain I may see in accuracy isn’t worth a huge increase in cost.
Mine rarely no reads ads and occasionally I get a shot I think “that can’t be right” but it’s always left which is my miss so it could be me. I think it over exaggerates offline but worst case that makes me a bit tighter dispersion wise on the course.
My only real point of annoyance is the lack of software update. I don’t think the $100 per year is as painful as some others but I’ve been wanting better integration with r-motion and the estimated club data which seems light years off with the delays on the basics.
Is a GC2 better. Sure but I’d personally struggle to pay that much for one right now. While it’s proven and solid it’s old technology at this point. I’m holding out for a unit that’s around $5k that does good ball and club data before I upgrade as the little gain I may see in accuracy isn’t worth a huge increase in cost.
Mine rarely no reads ads and occasionally I get a shot I think “that can’t be right” but it’s always left which is my miss so it could be me. I think it over exaggerates offline but worst case that makes me a bit tighter dispersion wise on the course.
My only real point of annoyance is the lack of software update. I don’t think the $100 per year is as painful as some others but I’ve been wanting better integration with r-motion and the estimated club data which seems light years off with the delays on the basics.
Comment