I had a Skytrak, an ES 16 and now a Protee base pack. I had some issue with Skytrak and low launch angle shots, but it sounds like much of that has been addressed and results have been improved since I had one. Overall, I thought the Skytrak did a good job with ball shot shapes and carry distances.
I wanted ball and club data, so I got my hands on a Protee base pack. I am still learning and trying to get the best out of it, but I have only had it a week. The setup is not that easy. There is a lot of info on this site and Protee's site, although much of it is years old and it's often hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. Also, the information on Protee's site is sometimes a bit out of date and from my point of view, may not show best practices. The default settings have not been that accurate, at least for me. What that seems to mean is to make the unit accurate, one has to know their numbers. Fortunately, I have Trackman, Flightscope, GC2, Skytrak, ES 16 and P3proswing data, so I have a fairly good idea what my swing, club distances and shapes look like. The numbers are getting better, still it is taking some time to improve results.
I wanted ball and club data, so I got my hands on a Protee base pack. I am still learning and trying to get the best out of it, but I have only had it a week. The setup is not that easy. There is a lot of info on this site and Protee's site, although much of it is years old and it's often hard to separate the wheat from the chaff. Also, the information on Protee's site is sometimes a bit out of date and from my point of view, may not show best practices. The default settings have not been that accurate, at least for me. What that seems to mean is to make the unit accurate, one has to know their numbers. Fortunately, I have Trackman, Flightscope, GC2, Skytrak, ES 16 and P3proswing data, so I have a fairly good idea what my swing, club distances and shapes look like. The numbers are getting better, still it is taking some time to improve results.
Comment