Do people prefer having an online fantasy that is much lower then their IRL handicap or would they prefer having an online handicap that more roughly approximates their irl handicap?
TGC Tour Handicap Calculation
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
I'm sure many would say they would want it roughly the same. That's why we all got into this simulator business, for the accuracy it gives us while still playing it at home. For me personally at least I know I want it to represent my actual game as much a possibleOriginally posted by Cklguy2013 View PostDo people prefer having an online fantasy that is much lower then their IRL handicap or would they prefer having an online handicap that more roughly approximates their irl handicap?
Comment
-
I'm a +2.4 IRL and +1.5 on the sim tour. The gimmies and perfect lie do help a lot but I also find that I don't make near as many intermediate length putts in sim golf as real life along with my wedge game being 10 times better in real life than in TGC. I don't know if it's not having that true depth perception or what, but I can't get consistent results 100 yards and in on TGC. So everything kind of evens out. In the Optishot league, I was pissed if I didn't shoot 7 or 8 under. So I'm obviously thrilled with how much closer Skytrak and TGC matches my real game.
Comment
-
Ok so my handicap was at 30.6 after I played my five rounds so I set it to 9 because if I look at my stats my average was 9 over par. Does this work? also will it keep adjusting after each round?My Courses:
DGWCBETA1 (L)
Shack's Window Co. Beta1 (L)
Quarry Golf Club V2 (L)
Metamora Fields V1 (L)
Metamora Fields Par 3 (L)
University Ridge V1 (L)
Stonewall_North_gCool/B33 (L)
Stonewall_Old_gCool/B33 (L)
Green Hill G.C. V2(L)
The Bear Forest CC V2 (L)
Perkins & Friends V1 (L)
Bellewood CC V1(L)
Stonewall North Par 3 (L)
Stonewall Old Par 3 (L)
The Ranch V1 (L)
Shenandoah BlueRed V1 (L)
Comment
-
Hey guys, I think the tournaments and handicapping are great, a big improvement from when I was last on here. I have a few thoughts though regarding further refining the handicapping system to get our caps more in line with our IRL handicaps. If the powers that be on here are interested in my input and assistance please let me know. Cheers, and keep up the great work!
Comment
-
What do you have in mind? Keep in mind Sim handicaps should be lower.Originally posted by Cklguy2013 View PostHey guys, I think the tournaments and handicapping are great, a big improvement from when I was last on here. I have a few thoughts though regarding further refining the handicapping system to get our caps more in line with our IRL handicaps. If the powers that be on here are interested in my input and assistance please let me know. Cheers, and keep up the great work!My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range
Comment
-
Your handicap will go up or down based on the formula on page one.Originally posted by Fieldygolf View PostDoes your handicap ever go up??My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range
Comment
-
Sim handicaps are lower because the course ratings are too high, if course ratings were lowered then sim handicaps could come close to IRL handicaps, more to it then that obviously, but that's a an overview.
Comment
-
For example, something like this:Course Yards Par Rating Slope The Oaks at Weschester blue tees 6543 72 69.6 124 Whistling Straits blue tees 6627 72 68.4 113 Merion East Ardmore Pa (Protee) 6182 72 66.8 120 Monarch Montreal Protee 6573 70 66.0 113 Winter Flathead Country Club 6380 72 66.4 120 Pine Valley White tees 6035 70 69.0 147 Tobo GolfKlub Protee #2 6173 72 65.4 135 Double Black Course at Christina Pines 6705 72 66.2 138 Tomahawk Golf Club 6886 71 67.8 147 NGLA 6514 72 [I 122 Oceanic Athletic Club 6777 72 147 Last edited by Cklguy2013; 10-25-2016, 12:35 AM.
Comment
-
I've thought of back-computing simulator course ratings and slopes based on scores posted in the tournament and the history of players who played relative to performance on other courses. Par for course rating and 113 for slope would be the starting point and adjust up or down based on some type of low and high handicap normalized results.
The USGA rates courses based on effective yardage, landing zone and hazards at common distances, remaining hazards, length, etc. so copying it the real way isn't really possible.
Comment
-
Yes but you could start with basic yardage then adjust up or down based on real scoring. Pine Valley about is a perfect example above, only 6,035 yards, but go back and look at the scores.
Comment
-
We are actually looking at this and trying to determine more accurate course ratings. We actually went from a really bad system to this and decided to have 3 set ratings. It's a huge improvement.Originally posted by Cklguy2013 View PostSim handicaps are lower because the course ratings are too high, if course ratings were lowered then sim handicaps could come close to IRL handicaps, more to it then that obviously, but that's a an overview.
Sim handicaps should always be lower. Not as low as yours but that will fix itself. There's no wind, no rough, no sand and perfect lies plus the game reads the greens and gives you 6 foot putts. TGC, once your used to it, should have you 2-4 shots better than IRL IMO.
Rest assurd, we are looking at the course ratings for this tour. We can't do anything about the game thus we use a handicap system independent of the game. TGC and our tour has come a long way. It only gets better and that's great.My Courses:
World Par 3's by mthunt
Toronto GC (L) mthunt
Burlington G&CC by mthunt
Weston G&CC by mthunt
London Hunt Club L mthunt
Park CC Lidar mthunt
Sunningdale GC Robinson L
Sunningdale GC Thompson L
Muirfield Village (liDAR) First Ever Lidar course
Country Club of Castle Pines (liDAR)
The Sanctuary GC ProTee L
The National GC L mthunt
Mississaugua GC L mthunt
Shaughnessy G&CC L mthunt
Markland Woods CC mthunt
Hidden Lake Old L mthunt
Magna GC L mthunt
Barrie CC L mthunt
mthunt Range
Comment
-
Oh I absolutely agree that it has come a long way, and Rome wasn't built in a day, so these things will come in time. Keep up the good work and if you need some assistance I'd be more than happy to help out.
Comment
-
I'm not disagreeing since you have good points, but real life scoring is strongly affected by the short game and putting, both I find significantly harder on a SIM. Especially when switching regularly between SIM and real golf. I don't know the answer but to me it isn't a given that SIM handicaps *should* be 2-4 shots better than IRL. If they were the same it wouldn't be obviously wrong IMO.Originally posted by mthunt View PostSim handicaps should always be lower. Not as low as yours but that will fix itself. There's no wind, no rough, no sand and perfect lies plus the game reads the greens and gives you 6 foot putts. TGC, once your used to it, should have you 2-4 shots better than IRL IMO.
Comment
Comment