Originally posted by luv2golf
View Post
1) You feel Skytrak is undervalued and they could charge double? Using your own numbers that would be getting around $8000. More than the GC2. Do you really think it is as good or even better than the GC2? Maybe you are right, i don't know for sure. But regardless most people think the GC2 is too expensive.
2) You must be older than me...I expect to be playing golf sim for 30 years. So using your numbers that makes it $5000. Getting close to your $6000 GC2.
3) Your $4000 doesn't include any course play. So you think $4000 for a driving range is reasonable? Most wouldn't. If you want course play isn't it minimum $200/year? So that makes it $6000 for your 20 year playing life and you can only play 10 courses.
4) If you'd rather pay $100/year instead of the lump sum equivalent? That is fine, some people prefer to pay a little at a time. That is why subscriptions have their place. Typically one pays more for that service since the vendor is essentially providing a financing service as well. But don't kid yourself about the true cost...if you are OK with that then fine. Others aren't, it remains to be seen if Skytrak is interested in the rest of the market or only those that "buy on time". Until they unveil their TGC packages we don't know if, or how, they intend to address the full market size available to them.
5) In your calculations you are assuming Skytrak keeps the subscription rate constant and inflation neutral. My experience is that once vendors have people hooked on their subscriptions they can't resist the urge to increase the costs faster than inflation...it is too easy to generate more profit without doing anything. Not saying Skytrak will or won't...see you in 20 years to find the answer to that!
Comment